Group
The message provided is:
Contents
[hide]Definition
A group is a set G and an operation ∗:G×G→G
Such that the following axioms hold:
Formal | Words |
---|---|
∀a,b,c∈G:[(a∗b)∗c=a∗(b∗c)] |
∗ is associative, because of this we may write a∗b∗c unambiguously.
|
∃e∈G∀g∈G[e∗g=g∗e=g] |
∗ has an identity element |
∀g∈G∃x∈G[xg=gx=e] |
All elements of G have an inverse element under ∗, that is to say for each item there is an item such that ∗-ing the item with g∈G we end up with the identity. |
For an "Abelian" or "commutative" group | |
∀g∈G∀h∈G[gh=hg] |
Order of the operation does not matter - it is commutative |
Trivial group
The trivial group G is the group of just one element, naturally all these groups are basically the same group, they are "isomorphic groups" (which is a bijective group homomorphism)
Notations
Usually with groups we use "multiplicative notation", if the group is Abelian we use additive. This is (probably) motivated from linear algebra. Addition of matrices is commutative, just like with numbers however multiplication is not (always) commutative, so we do not.
Additive
Seriously, additive notation unofficially ⟹
Doing things multiple times is denoted as one would expect, nx=x+x+...+x
TODO: Relate to group action
To do this write something like "Let G be an Abelian group with the operation +:G×G→G given by (definition of addition)"
If the operation is obvious then "Let G be the set of (whatever) and let (G,+) be a group"
Multiplicative
Multiplicative groups may be Abelian, but it really ought to be explicit
We use 1 to denote the identity element and x−1 to denote the inverse. Note that xn=xxx...x
TODO: Link with group action
Convention notes
One need not write "(because G is Abelian)" after steps in proofs, additive implies Abelian so for example if I am writing:
- ...⟹A+B=C+Abut C+A=A+Cso we may use the cancellation laws....
it is clear that I am using the property of commutativity
- ...⟹ab=cabut ca=acso we may use the cancellation laws....
This looks like ca=ac
- ...⟹ab=cabut ca=ac(as G is Abelian) so we may use the cancellation laws....
Perfect
Important theorems
Identity is unique
Proof that the identity is unique. (Method: assume e and e′ with e≠e′
Now we know the identity is unique, so we can give it a symbol:
Group | Identity element |
---|---|
(G,+) - additive notation a+b | We denote the identity 0, so a+0=0+a=a |
(G,∗) - multiplicative notation ab | We denote the identity 1, so 1a=a∗1=a |
GL(n,F) - the General linear group (All n×n matrices of non-zero determinant) |
We denote the identity by Id,I,In or sometimes Idn that is AI=IA=A |
Inverse is unique
Proof that the inverse is unique. (Suppose that x
We may now denote the inverse of an element uniquely.
Here x is some arbitrary member of G
Group | Inverse element |
---|---|
(G,+) - additive notation a+b | We denote the inverse by −x, so x+(−x)=(−x)+x=0 |
Note that a+(−x) is often written as a−x - this is a shorthand, no "subtraction" is defined
| |
(G,∗) - multiplicative notation ab | We denote the inverse of x by x−1, so x−1x=xx−1=1 |
GL(n,F) - the General linear group (All n×n matrices of non-zero determinant) |
We denote the inverse of X∈GL(n,F) by X−1 |
Cancellation laws
These are extremely important.
- ab=ac⟹b=c
- ba=ca⟹b=c
Proof that ab=ac⟹b=c
If ab=e then b=a−1
This is the final theorem on this page, and it is easy to show.
If ab=e=aa−1⟹ab=aa−1⟹b=a−1
(a−1)−1=a
As a−1a=e
See also
- Pages requiring references
- Pages requiring references of unknown grade
- Todo
- Definitions
- Abstract Algebra Definitions
- Abstract Algebra
- Group Theory Definitions
- Group Theory
- Theorems
- Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Abstract Algebra Theorems
- Abstract Algebra Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- Group Theory Theorems
- Group Theory Theorems, lemmas and corollaries
- First-year friendly
- Exemplary pages