Floor function

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: B
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Research consensus and handling negative numbers

\newcommand{\Floor}[1]{ {\text{Floor}{\left({#1}\right)} } }

Definition

For x\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} there is no variation on the meaning of the floor function, however for negative numbers there are varying conventions.

Non-negative

Defined as follows:

  • \text{Floor}:\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}_0 by \text{Floor}:x\mapsto\text{Max} (T_x) where T_x:\eq\big\{n\in\mathbb{N}_0\ \big\vert\ n\le x\big\}\subseteq\mathbb{N}_0\subseteq\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} - note that the maximum element is defined as T_x is always finite.
  • This has the property that x\le\Floor{x} .

Negative numbers

Researching this opened my eyes to a massive dispute.... consensus seems to be that x\le \Floor{x} is maintained, rounding is a separate and massive issue!

References

Future work

Properties

  1. \forall n\in\mathbb{N}_0\subseteq\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}\big[\Floor{n}\eq n\big], or \text{Floor}\vert_{\mathbb{N}_0}\eq\text{Id}_{\mathbb{N}_0} - its restriction to \mathbb{N}_0 is the identity map on \mathbb{N}_0
  2. \forall x,y\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}\big[(x\le y)\implies\big(\Floor{x}\le\Floor{y}\big)\big] - monotonicity
  3. \forall x\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}\exists\epsilon\in[0,1)\subseteq\mathbb{R}\big[x\eq\Floor{x}+\epsilon\big] - the characteristic property of the floor function

I believe that 3\implies 1 and 3\implies 2 might be possible, so these are perhaps in the wrong order. I just wanted to write down some notes before they get put into the massive stack of unfiled paper

This is a corollary to property 3 coupled with the definition (domain and co domain) of the floor function:

  • \forall x\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}\big[\Floor{x}\le x<\Floor{x}+1\big]

This statement is a critical part of finding Mdms and was used in: