Every surjective map gives rise to an equivalence relation

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning:

Warning:There is something wrong here, as the surjective property is never used! It is true though that every map, f:XY gives rise to an equivalence relation, where x1x2 if f(x2)=f(x2) but this doesn't use the surjective part!

  • Notice also that in such a case we can factor f through π:XX/ always to yield ˉf, and "distil" the information of f into this new map, ˉf.
This page is a dire page and is in desperate need of an update.
The message is:
Why was it even created?! Fix the surjective problem



Stub grade: C
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Flesh out, check existing content then demote to grade F
Grade: D
This page requires references, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable, it just means that the author of the page doesn't have a book to hand, or remember the book to find it, which would have been a suitable reference.
The message provided is:
Something in Topological Manifolds (Lee) should cover this. Under Quotient topology

Statement

Let X and Y be sets, and let f:XY be a surjective mapping. Then we can define an equivalence relation on X, ∼⊆X×X, by:

  • For x1,x2X, we say x1x2 if f(x1)=f(x2)

So we have x1,x2X[x1x2f(x1)=f(x2)] (for the "and only if" part, see definitions and iff)

Purpose

The quotient topology can be defined using a map to identify parts together, but also an equivalence relation can do the same job, this page is half way to showing them to be the same.

Proof

Grade: C
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
This is easy. Truly

This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof

References