Equivalent statements to compactness of a metric space

From Maths
Revision as of 11:37, 27 May 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Theorem statement: Linking sub-page in)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Theorem statement

Given a metric space [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath], the following are equivalent[1][Note 1]:

  1. [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is compact
  2. Every sequence in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] has a subsequence that converges (AKA: having a convergent subsequence)
  3. [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is totally bounded and complete

Proof

[ilmath]1)\implies 2)[/ilmath]: [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is compact [ilmath]\implies[/ilmath] [ilmath]\forall(a_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq X\ \exists[/ilmath] a sub-sequence [ilmath](a_{k_n})_{n=1}^\infty[/ilmath] that coverges in [ilmath]X[/ilmath]


  1. Using every sequence in a compact space is a lingering sequence and
  2. every lingering sequence has a convergent subsequence

We see that every sequence in a compact space has a convergent subsequence.

[ilmath]2)\implies 3)[/ilmath]: Suppose for all sequences [ilmath](x_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq X[/ilmath] that [ilmath] ({ x_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty } [/ilmath] has a convergent subsequence [ilmath]\implies[/ilmath] [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath] is a complete metric space and is totally bounded


Proof of completeness:

To show [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath] is complete we must show that every Cauchy sequence converges. To do this:

Q.E.D.

Proof that [ilmath](X,d)[/ilmath] is totally bounded


TODO: Do this


Q.E.D.



TODO: Rest, namely: [ilmath]3\implies 1[/ilmath]



Notes

  1. To say statements are equivalent means we have one [ilmath]\iff[/ilmath] one of the other(s)

References

  1. Introduction to Topology - Theodore W. Gamelin & Robert Everist Greene