Notes:Halmos measure theory skeleton

From Maths
Revision as of 20:05, 22 March 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Saving work)

Jump to: navigation, search

Skeleton

  • Ring of sets
  • Sigma-ring
  • additive set function
  • measure, μ - extended real valued, non negative, countably additive set function defined on a ring of sets
    • complete measure - μ is complete if:
      • ARB[BAμ(A)=0BR]
  • hereditary system - a system of sets, E such that if EE then FP(E)[FE]
    • hereditary ring generated by
  • subadditivity
  • outer measure, μ (p42) - extended real valued, non-negative, monotone and countably subadditive set function on an hereditary σ-ring with μ()=0
    • Theorem: If μ is a measure on a ring R and if:
      • AH(R)[μ(A)=inf{n=1μ(An) | (An)n=1RAn=1An}] then μ is an extension of μ to an outer measure on H(R)
    • μ is the outer measure induced by the measure μ
  • μ-measurable - given an outer measure μ on a hereditary σ-ring H a set AH is μ-measurable if:
    • BH[μ(B)=μ(AB)+μ(BA)]
      • PROBLEM: How can we do complementation in a ring?[Solution 1]
      • Solution: Note that ST=ST, so Halmos is really saying:
        • AH is μ-measurable if:
          • BH[μ(B)=μ(AB)+μ(BA)]
  • Theorem: if μ is an outer measure on a hereditary σ-ring H and if S is the class of all μ-measurable sets, then S is a ring of sets
  • Theorem: (p46) - S is a sigma-ring
  • Theorem: - Every set of μ=0 belongs to S and the set function ˉμ:SˉR0 is a complete measure (AKA: ˉμ is the measure induced by μ).
  • Theorem - Every set in σR(R) is μ-measurable (the σ-ring generated by R)
    • Alternatively: σR(R)S
  • Theorem - AH(R)[μ(A)Outer=inf{ˉμ(B) | ABS}Induced by ˉμ={ˉμ(B) | ABσR(R)}Induced by ˉμ]
    • That is to say that:
      • Outer measure induced by ˉμ on σR(R) AND
      • the outer measure induced by ˉμ on S
      • agree with μ
  • completion of a measure - p55
  • Theorem: if μ is a σ-finite measure on a σ-ring R and if μ is the outer measure it induces, then:
    • The completion of the extension of μ to σR(R) is identical with μ on the class of all μ-measurable sets

Solutions

  1. Jump up We only have to deal with AB which could just be Halmos abusing notation. If we take it literally ("B:={x(?)|xB}") we may be able to work through this. Note that the intersection of sets is a subset of each set so ABA and is in fact =AB, so what Halmos is really saying is:
    • AH is μ-measurable if:
      • BH[μ(B)=μ(BA)+μ(BA)]