Notes:Halmos measure theory skeleton
From Maths
Skeleton
- Ring of sets
- Sigma-ring
- additive set function
- measure, μ - extended real valued, non negative, countably additive set function defined on a ring of sets
- complete measure - μ is complete if:
- ∀A∈R∀B[B⊆A∧μ(A)=0⟹B∈R]
- complete measure - μ is complete if:
- hereditary system - a system of sets, E such that if E∈E then ∀F∈P(E)[F∈E]
- hereditary ring generated by
- subadditivity
- outer measure, μ∗ (p42) - extended real valued, non-negative, monotone and countably subadditive set function on an hereditary σ-ring with μ∗(∅)=0
- Theorem: If μ is a measure on a ring R and if:
- ∀A∈H(R)[μ∗(A)=inf{∑∞n=1μ(An) | (An)∞n=1⊆R∧A⊆⋃∞n=1An}] then μ∗ is an extension of μ to an outer measure on H(R)
- μ∗ is the outer measure induced by the measure μ
- Theorem: If μ is a measure on a ring R and if:
- μ∗-measurable - given an outer measure μ∗ on a hereditary σ-ring H a set A∈H is μ∗-measurable if:
- ∀B∈H[μ∗(B)=μ∗(A∩B)+μ∗(B∩A′)]
- PROBLEM: How can we do complementation in a ring?[Solution 1]
- Solution: Note that S∩T′=S−T, so Halmos is really saying:
- A∈H is μ∗-measurable if:
- ∀B∈H[μ∗(B)=μ∗(A∩B)+μ∗(B−A)]
- A∈H is μ∗-measurable if:
- ∀B∈H[μ∗(B)=μ∗(A∩B)+μ∗(B∩A′)]
- Theorem: if μ∗ is an outer measure on a hereditary σ-ring H and if S is the class of all μ∗-measurable sets, then S is a ring of sets
- Theorem: (p46) - S is a sigma-ring
- Theorem: - Every set of μ∗=0 belongs to S and the set function ˉμ:S→ˉR≥0 is a complete measure (AKA: ˉμ is the measure induced by μ∗).
- Theorem - Every set in σR(R) is μ∗-measurable (the σ-ring generated by R)
- Alternatively: σR(R)⊆S
- Theorem - ∀A∈H(R)[μ∗(A)⏟Outer=inf{ˉμ(B) | A⊆B∈S}⏟Induced by ˉμ={ˉμ(B) | A⊆B∈σR(R)}⏟Induced by ˉμ]
- That is to say that:
- Outer measure induced by ˉμ on σR(R) AND
- the outer measure induced by ˉμ on S
- agree with μ∗
- That is to say that:
- completion of a measure - p55
- Theorem: if μ is a σ-finite measure on a σ-ring R and if μ∗ is the outer measure it induces, then:
- The completion of the extension of μ to σR(R) is identical with μ∗ on the class of all μ∗-measurable sets
Solutions
- Jump up ↑ We only have to deal with A∩B′ which could just be Halmos abusing notation. If we take it literally ("B′:={x(∈?)|x∉B}") we may be able to work through this. Note that the intersection of sets is a subset of each set so A∩B′⊆A and is in fact =A−B, so what Halmos is really saying is:
- A∈H is μ∗-measurable if:
- ∀B∈H[μ∗(B)=μ∗(B∩A)+μ∗(B−A)]
- A∈H is μ∗-measurable if: