Difference between revisions of "Notes:Measure theory plan"
From Maths
m |
m |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Show that {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})}} (the sigma-ring generated by) is inside the {{sigma|ring}} constructed from the outer-measure. | * Show that {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})}} (the sigma-ring generated by) is inside the {{sigma|ring}} constructed from the outer-measure. | ||
* Conclude that the sets in {{M|\mathcal{R} }} are in this new ring (trivial/definition) and the job is done, we have constructed a measure on {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})}} | * Conclude that the sets in {{M|\mathcal{R} }} are in this new ring (trivial/definition) and the job is done, we have constructed a measure on {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Remaining problems== | ||
+ | If {{M|\cdot}} is some arbitrary elements of the powerset (so {{M|\cdot\subseteq\mathcal{P}(X)}}) what letter to use, for example, {{M|f:\mathcal{A}\rightarrow\text{whatever} }} suggests an ''algebra'' in place. What letter to use for "just an arbitrary collection of subsets" eg for use on [[additive set function]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Symbols and terminology== | ||
+ | {{Infobox | ||
+ | |title=Symbols of: | ||
+ | |above=<span style="font-size:2em;">Measure Theory</span> | ||
+ | |subheader=(Conventions established on this site)<br/>Order of introduction | ||
+ | |group1=test | ||
+ | |header1=[[System of sets|Systems of sets]]<br/>Collections of subsets of {{M|X}} | ||
+ | |label1={{M|\mathcal{R} }} | ||
+ | |data1=[[Ring of sets]] | ||
+ | |label2={{M|\mathcal{A} }} | ||
+ | |data2=[[Algebra of sets]] | ||
+ | |label3=(UNDECIDED) | ||
+ | |data3=Arbitrary collection of subsets | ||
+ | |label4={{M|\mathcal{S} }} | ||
+ | |data4="Measurable" sets of the [[Outer-measure]] | ||
+ | |header5=Measures | ||
+ | |label5={{M|\bar{\mu}:\mathcal{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} | ||
+ | |data5=[[Pre-measure]] | ||
+ | |label6={{M|\mu^*:\mathcal{P}(X)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} | ||
+ | |data6={{nowrap|[[Outer-measure]]}} | ||
+ | |label7={{M|\tilde{\mu}:\mathcal{S}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} | ||
+ | |data7=[[Measure induced by the outer-measure]] | ||
+ | |label8={{M|\mu:\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} | ||
+ | |data8=[[measure induced on the sigma ring generated by]] | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | * {{M|\mathcal{R} }} - [[Ring of sets]] - basically as it currently is | ||
+ | ** {{M|\mathcal{A} }} - Mention [[Algebra of sets]] | ||
+ | * {{M|\bar{\mu}:\mathcal{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} (positive) [[Pre-measure]] - use the symbol {{M|\bar{\mu} }} ''instead of'' {{M|\mu}} | ||
+ | * {{M|\mu^*:\mathcal{P}(X)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} - [[outer-measure]] | ||
+ | * {{M|\mathcal{S} }} for the "outer-measurable sets" (and discussion of definition), proof is ring, proof is {{sigma|ring}} | ||
+ | * {{M|\tilde{\mu}:\mathcal{S}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} - induced measure on {{M|\mathcal{S} }} (if needed) | ||
+ | * {{M|\mu:\sigma_R(\mathcal{R}):\sigma_R(\mathcal{R})\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}\cup\{+\infty\} }} - induced measure on the generated sigma ring. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Notes|Measure Theory}} |
Latest revision as of 19:28, 24 May 2016
Purpose
This document is the plan for the measure theory notation and development on this site.
Plan
- Introduce ring of sets
- PRE-MEASURE (ˉμ) - Introduce a (positive) extended real valued countably additive set function, ˉμ on that ring. This will be a pre-measure and these are easy to create (use Lebesgue measure as example) which is why they're the first step.
- OUTER-MEASURE (μ∗) - a construct named because it measures from the outside of a set and comes down (the inf), this lets us "measure" on a power-set like construction (a hereditary σ-ring) which contains every subset of every set in the ring, as well as being closed under countable union and set subtraction.
- PROBLEM: Outer measures are only subadditive not additive so they're not really measures. Make sure this weakness is demonstrated.
- We need to consider only the sets that have the property of dividing up every other set in the hereditary sigma-ring additively.
- We then show this new structure is a ring
- We then show this new structure is a σ-ring
- MEASURE (μ) - The restriction of the outer-measure, μ∗, μ to this σ-ring is a measure, a pre-measure but on a σ-ring (instead of just ring)
- Show μ is countably additive
We have now constructed a measure on a σ-ring, μ from a pre-measure on a ring, ˉμ
Remaining steps
- Show that σR(R) (the sigma-ring generated by) is inside the σ-ring constructed from the outer-measure.
- Conclude that the sets in R are in this new ring (trivial/definition) and the job is done, we have constructed a measure on σR(R)
Remaining problems
If ⋅ is some arbitrary elements of the powerset (so ⋅⊆P(X)) what letter to use, for example, f:A→whatever suggests an algebra in place. What letter to use for "just an arbitrary collection of subsets" eg for use on additive set function
Symbols and terminology
Symbols of: | |
Measure Theory | |
(Conventions established on this site) Order of introduction | |
Systems of sets Collections of subsets of X | |
---|---|
R | Ring of sets |
A | Algebra of sets |
(UNDECIDED) | Arbitrary collection of subsets |
S | "Measurable" sets of the Outer-measure |
Measures | |
ˉμ:R→R≥0∪{+∞} | Pre-measure |
μ∗:P(X)→R≥0∪{+∞} | Outer-measure |
˜μ:S→R≥0∪{+∞} | Measure induced by the outer-measure |
μ:σR(R)→R≥0∪{+∞} | measure induced on the sigma ring generated by |
- R - Ring of sets - basically as it currently is
- A - Mention Algebra of sets
- ˉμ:R→R≥0∪{+∞} (positive) Pre-measure - use the symbol ˉμ instead of μ
- μ∗:P(X)→R≥0∪{+∞} - outer-measure
- S for the "outer-measurable sets" (and discussion of definition), proof is ring, proof is σ-ring
- ˜μ:S→R≥0∪{+∞} - induced measure on S (if needed)
- μ:σR(R):σR(R)→R≥0∪{+∞} - induced measure on the generated sigma ring.