Difference between revisions of "Sequence"
(Created page with " ==Introduction== A sequence is one of the earliest and easiest definitions encountered, but I will restate it. I was taught to denote the sequence <math>\{a_1,a_2,...\}</ma...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:26, 8 March 2015
Introduction
A sequence is one of the earliest and easiest definitions encountered, but I will restate it.
I was taught to denote the sequence [math]\{a_1,a_2,...\}[/math] by [math]\{a_n\}_{n=1}^\infty[/math] however I don't like this, as it looks like a set. I have seen the notation [math](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/math] and I must say I prefer it.
Definition
Formally a sequence is a function[1], [math]f:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow S[/math] where [ilmath]S[/ilmath] is some set. For a finite sequence it is simply [math]f:\{1,...,n\}\rightarrow S[/math]
There is little more to say.
Convergence of a sequence
A sequence [math](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/math] in a metric space [ilmath]V[/ilmath] (Keep in mind it is easy to get a metric given a normed vector space) is said to converge to a limit [math]a\in V[/math] if:
[math]\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}:n > N\implies d(a_n,a)<\epsilon[/math] - note the implicit [math]\forall n[/math]
In this case we may write: [math]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(a_n)=a[/math]
Notes
Usually [math]\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}: n > N\implies |a_n-a|<\epsilon[/math] is first seen, or even just a Null sequence then defining converging to [ilmath]a[/ilmath] by subtraction, like with Continuous map you move on to a metric space.
In a normed vector space as you'd expect it's defined as follows:
[math]\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}:n > N\implies\|a_n-a\|<\epsilon[/math], note this it the definition of the sequence [math](\|a_n-a\|)_{n=1}^\infty[/math] tending towards 0
See also
References
- ↑ p46 - Introduction To Set Theory, third edition, Jech and Hrbacek