Difference between revisions of "Ordering"
(Created page with "An ordering is a special kind of relation, other than the concept of a relation we require three properties before we can define it. ==Required properties== Thes...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An ordering is a special kind of [[Relation|relation]], other than the concept of a relation we require three properties before we can define it. | An ordering is a special kind of [[Relation|relation]], other than the concept of a relation we require three properties before we can define it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Note== | ||
+ | Partial orderings and strict orderings are very similar, and the terms differ slightly for each. For example for {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} to be '''comparable''' in a partial ordering (for a relation {{M|R}} in {{M|A}}) it means that <math>aRb\vee bRa</math> - an example would be {{M|\le}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | However! For a strict ordering for {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} to be comparable we must have: <math>a\ne b\implies[aRb\vee bRa]</math>, for example {{M|<}} | ||
==Required properties== | ==Required properties== | ||
These are restated from the [[Relation|relation]] page for convenience | These are restated from the [[Relation|relation]] page for convenience | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Here {{M|R}} will be a relation in {{M|A}} | |
− | + | {| class="wikitable" border="1" | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | ! Property | |
− | + | ! Statement | |
− | + | ! Example | |
− | + | ! Partial | |
− | A relation | + | ! Strict |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | Symmetric | |
+ | | <math>\forall a\in A\forall b\in A(aRb\implies bRa)</math> | ||
+ | | [[Equivalence relation|equiv relations]] | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Antisymmetric | ||
+ | | <math>\forall a\in A\forall b\in A([aRb\wedge bRa]\implies a=b)</math> | ||
+ | | Let {{M|1=A=\mathbb{N} }} then <math>[a\le b\wedge b\le a]\implies a=b</math> | ||
+ | | # | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Asymmetric | ||
+ | | <math>\forall a\in A\forall b\in B(aRb\implies (b,a)\notin R)</math> | ||
+ | | If {{M|a < b}} then {{M|b < a}} is false | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | # | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Reflexive | ||
+ | | <math>\forall a\in A(aRa)</math> | ||
+ | | [[Equivalence relation|equiv relations]], Let {{M|1=A=\mathbb{N} }} then <math>a\le a</math> | ||
+ | | # | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Transitive | ||
+ | | <math>\forall a\in A\forall b\in A\forall c\in A([aRb\wedge bRc]\implies aRc)</math> | ||
+ | | [[Equivalence relation|equiv relations]], {{M|1=A=\mathbb{N} }} then <math>a\le b\wedge b\le c\iff a\le b\le c\implies a\le c</math> | ||
+ | | # | ||
+ | | # | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
If we have "just an ordering" it refers to a partial ordering. | If we have "just an ordering" it refers to a partial ordering. | ||
Line 22: | Line 55: | ||
===Strict ordering=== | ===Strict ordering=== | ||
A relation {{M|S}} in {{M|A}} is a strict ordering if it is asymmetric and transitive. | A relation {{M|S}} in {{M|A}} is a strict ordering if it is asymmetric and transitive. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Comparable elements== | ||
+ | We say {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} are comparable if the following hold: | ||
+ | ===Partial ordering=== | ||
+ | For {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} to be comparable we must have <math>aRb\vee bRa</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Strict ordering=== | ||
+ | For {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} to be comparable we require <math>a\ne b\implies[aRb\vee bRa]</math>, notice that false [[Implies|implies]] false | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Total ordering (Linear ordering)== | ||
+ | A (partial or strict) ordering is a total (also known as linear) ordering if <math>\forall a\in A\forall b\in B</math>, {{M|a}} and {{M|b}} are comparable using the definitions above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example the ordering <math>a|b</math> meaning {{M|a}} divides {{M|b}} (example: <math>(3,6)\iff 3|6</math>) is not total, however <math>\le</math> is, as is <math> ></math> | ||
{{Definition|Set Theory}} | {{Definition|Set Theory}} |
Revision as of 09:45, 12 March 2015
An ordering is a special kind of relation, other than the concept of a relation we require three properties before we can define it.
Contents
Note
Partial orderings and strict orderings are very similar, and the terms differ slightly for each. For example for [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] to be comparable in a partial ordering (for a relation [ilmath]R[/ilmath] in [ilmath]A[/ilmath]) it means that [math]aRb\vee bRa[/math] - an example would be [ilmath]\le[/ilmath]
However! For a strict ordering for [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] to be comparable we must have: [math]a\ne b\implies[aRb\vee bRa][/math], for example [ilmath]<[/ilmath]
Required properties
These are restated from the relation page for convenience
Here [ilmath]R[/ilmath] will be a relation in [ilmath]A[/ilmath]
Property | Statement | Example | Partial | Strict |
---|---|---|---|---|
Symmetric | [math]\forall a\in A\forall b\in A(aRb\implies bRa)[/math] | equiv relations | ||
Antisymmetric | [math]\forall a\in A\forall b\in A([aRb\wedge bRa]\implies a=b)[/math] | Let [ilmath]A=\mathbb{N}[/ilmath] then [math][a\le b\wedge b\le a]\implies a=b[/math] | # | |
Asymmetric | [math]\forall a\in A\forall b\in B(aRb\implies (b,a)\notin R)[/math] | If [ilmath]a < b[/ilmath] then [ilmath]b < a[/ilmath] is false | # | |
Reflexive | [math]\forall a\in A(aRa)[/math] | equiv relations, Let [ilmath]A=\mathbb{N}[/ilmath] then [math]a\le a[/math] | # | |
Transitive | [math]\forall a\in A\forall b\in A\forall c\in A([aRb\wedge bRc]\implies aRc)[/math] | equiv relations, [ilmath]A=\mathbb{N}[/ilmath] then [math]a\le b\wedge b\le c\iff a\le b\le c\implies a\le c[/math] | # | # |
Definition
If we have "just an ordering" it refers to a partial ordering.
Partial Ordering
A binary relation that is antisymmetric, reflexive and transitive is a partial ordering. An example of a partial ordering is [ilmath]\le[/ilmath], notice [ilmath]a\le b[/ilmath] and [math]b\le a\implies a=b[/math]
Strict ordering
A relation [ilmath]S[/ilmath] in [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is a strict ordering if it is asymmetric and transitive.
Comparable elements
We say [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] are comparable if the following hold:
Partial ordering
For [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] to be comparable we must have [math]aRb\vee bRa[/math]
Strict ordering
For [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] to be comparable we require [math]a\ne b\implies[aRb\vee bRa][/math], notice that false implies false
Total ordering (Linear ordering)
A (partial or strict) ordering is a total (also known as linear) ordering if [math]\forall a\in A\forall b\in B[/math], [ilmath]a[/ilmath] and [ilmath]b[/ilmath] are comparable using the definitions above.
For example the ordering [math]a|b[/math] meaning [ilmath]a[/ilmath] divides [ilmath]b[/ilmath] (example: [math](3,6)\iff 3|6[/math]) is not total, however [math]\le[/math] is, as is [math] >[/math]