Difference between revisions of "Set theory axioms"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
| 3
 
| 3
 
| Schema of Comprehension
 
| Schema of Comprehension
| For a property {{M|P(x)}} of x, given a set {{M|A}} there is a set {{M|B}} such that {{M|x\in B\iff x\in A\text{ and }p(x)}}
+
| For a property {{M|P(x)}} of x, given a set {{M|A}} there is a set {{M|B}} such that {{M|x\in B\iff x\in A\text{ and }p(x)}}.<br/>A property may be <math>P(x):=x\in A=\phi(x,A)</math> where <math>\phi</math> is a ''formula''
 
| <math>\forall X\forall p\exists Y\forall u(u\in Y\leftrightarrow[u\in X\wedge\phi(u,p)])</math>
 
| <math>\forall X\forall p\exists Y\forall u(u\in Y\leftrightarrow[u\in X\wedge\phi(u,p)])</math>
 
|-
 
|-
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| Pair
 
| Pair
 
| For any {{M|A}} and {{M|B}} there is a set {{M|C}} such that <math>x\in C\iff x=A\text{ or }x=B</math>
 
| For any {{M|A}} and {{M|B}} there is a set {{M|C}} such that <math>x\in C\iff x=A\text{ or }x=B</math>
 +
| <math>\forall A\forall B\exists C\forall x(x\in C\leftrightarrow x=A\vee x=B)</math>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| R
 
| R
 
|
 
|
 
| The set known to exist from axiom 4 is unique, we denote it by <math>\{A,B\}</math> or <math>\{A\}</math> if <math>A=B</math> (at this point we "just write" this, we have no concept of cardinality yet)
 
| The set known to exist from axiom 4 is unique, we denote it by <math>\{A,B\}</math> or <math>\{A\}</math> if <math>A=B</math> (at this point we "just write" this, we have no concept of cardinality yet)
 +
|-
 +
| R
 +
|
 +
| [[Ordered pair]]
 +
| Kuratowski: <math>(a,b)=\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}</math>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 5
 
| 5
Line 53: Line 59:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{M|A}} is a subset of {{M|B}} if and only if every element of {{M|A}} belongs to {{M|B}}, that is <math>\forall x:x\in A\implies x\in B</math> - we denote this <math>A\subset B</math>
 
| {{M|A}} is a subset of {{M|B}} if and only if every element of {{M|A}} belongs to {{M|B}}, that is <math>\forall x:x\in A\implies x\in B</math> - we denote this <math>A\subset B</math>
 +
| <math>\forall u(u\in A\rightarrow u\in B)</math><math>\iff \subset(A,B)\iff A\subset B</math>
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| 6
 
| 6
Line 58: Line 65:
 
| For any set {{M|S}} there eixsts a set {{M|\mathcal{P} }} such that {{M|X\in\mathcal{P}\iff X\subset S}} (see [[Power set]])
 
| For any set {{M|S}} there eixsts a set {{M|\mathcal{P} }} such that {{M|X\in\mathcal{P}\iff X\subset S}} (see [[Power set]])
 
| <math>\forall X\exists\mathcal{P}\forall U(\forall s(s\in U\rightarrow s\in X)\leftrightarrow U\in\mathcal{P})</math>
 
| <math>\forall X\exists\mathcal{P}\forall U(\forall s(s\in U\rightarrow s\in X)\leftrightarrow U\in\mathcal{P})</math>
 +
|-
 +
| 7
 +
| Infinite set
 +
| There exists an [[Inductive property]]
 +
| <math>\exists S(\emptyset \in S\wedge \forall x(x\in S\rightarrow x\cup\{x\}\in S))</math>
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
 
[[Category:Set Theory]]
 
[[Category:Set Theory]]

Latest revision as of 10:25, 11 March 2015

This page is supposed to provide some discussion for the axioms (for example "there exists a set with no elements" doesn't really deserve its own page)

List of axioms

The number column describes the order of introduction in the motivation for set theory axioms page, note that "R" denotes a result. Only "major" results are shown, they are covered in the motivation for set theory page, and "D" denotes "definition" - which is something that is natural to define at that point

Number Axiom Description Formal statement
1 Existence There exists a set with no elements
2 Extensionality (Equality) If every element of [ilmath]X[/ilmath] is also an element of [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] and every element of [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is also an element of [ilmath]X[/ilmath] then
[math]\forall X\forall Y(\forall u(u\in X\leftrightarrow u\in Y)\rightarrow X=Y)[/math]
R The empty set is unique can now be proved, and thus denoted [math]\emptyset[/math]
3 Schema of Comprehension For a property [ilmath]P(x)[/ilmath] of x, given a set [ilmath]A[/ilmath] there is a set [ilmath]B[/ilmath] such that [ilmath]x\in B\iff x\in A\text{ and }p(x)[/ilmath].
A property may be [math]P(x):=x\in A=\phi(x,A)[/math] where [math]\phi[/math] is a formula
[math]\forall X\forall p\exists Y\forall u(u\in Y\leftrightarrow[u\in X\wedge\phi(u,p)])[/math]
R For a set [ilmath]A[/ilmath] and a property [ilmath]P[/ilmath] the set known to exist by axiom 3 is unique, thus we may write [math]\{x\in A|P(x)\}[/math] to denote it unambiguously
4 Pair For any [ilmath]A[/ilmath] and [ilmath]B[/ilmath] there is a set [ilmath]C[/ilmath] such that [math]x\in C\iff x=A\text{ or }x=B[/math] [math]\forall A\forall B\exists C\forall x(x\in C\leftrightarrow x=A\vee x=B)[/math]
R The set known to exist from axiom 4 is unique, we denote it by [math]\{A,B\}[/math] or [math]\{A\}[/math] if [math]A=B[/math] (at this point we "just write" this, we have no concept of cardinality yet)
R Ordered pair Kuratowski: [math](a,b)=\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}[/math]
5 Union For any set [ilmath]S[/ilmath] there exists a set [ilmath]U[/ilmath] such that [math]x\in U\iff[x\in A\text{ for some }A\in S][/math] [math]\forall X\exists U\forall s(s\in U\leftrightarrow \exists A(A\in X\wedge S\in A))[/math]
R The union of a set S is unique, and thus denoted by [math]\cup S[/math]
D [ilmath]A[/ilmath] is a subset of [ilmath]B[/ilmath] if and only if every element of [ilmath]A[/ilmath] belongs to [ilmath]B[/ilmath], that is [math]\forall x:x\in A\implies x\in B[/math] - we denote this [math]A\subset B[/math] [math]\forall u(u\in A\rightarrow u\in B)[/math][math]\iff \subset(A,B)\iff A\subset B[/math]
6 Power set For any set [ilmath]S[/ilmath] there eixsts a set [ilmath]\mathcal{P} [/ilmath] such that [ilmath]X\in\mathcal{P}\iff X\subset S[/ilmath] (see Power set) [math]\forall X\exists\mathcal{P}\forall U(\forall s(s\in U\rightarrow s\in X)\leftrightarrow U\in\mathcal{P})[/math]
7 Infinite set There exists an Inductive property [math]\exists S(\emptyset \in S\wedge \forall x(x\in S\rightarrow x\cup\{x\}\in S))[/math]