Difference between revisions of "Notes:Basis for a topology/McCarty"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Overview== After finding out that base/subbase are terms (and the book I saw them in wasn't the odd one out) I've decided to note what the book says here. Things make a lo...")
 
(Added note about continuity.)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
# {{M|\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{J} }} and
 
# {{M|\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{J} }} and
 
# For each member of {{M|\mathcal{J} }} the member is the union of (finite intersections of elements of {{M|\mathcal{A} }})
 
# For each member of {{M|\mathcal{J} }} the member is the union of (finite intersections of elements of {{M|\mathcal{A} }})
 
+
==Applications to continuity==
 +
===Theorem===
 +
Suppose {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}} is a [[function]] between two {{plural|topological space|s}}, {{Top.|X|J}} and {{Top.|Y|K}}. Let {{M|\mathcal{A} }} be a sub-basis for {{M|\mathcal{K} }}, then:
 +
* {{M|f}} is [[continuous]] {{iff}} {{M|1=\forall A\in\mathcal{A}[f^{-1}(A)\in\mathcal{J}]}}
 +
{{Todo|1=I really need to create the pages that show the pre-image of functions preserves things like unions and intersections}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references group="Note"/>
 
<references group="Note"/>

Latest revision as of 16:58, 16 August 2016

Overview

After finding out that base/subbase are terms (and the book I saw them in wasn't the odd one out) I've decided to note what the book says here.

Things make a lot more sense now.

Statements

Definition: Basis / Base

Let [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath] be a topological space, let [ilmath]\mathcal{B}\subseteq\mathcal{J} [/ilmath]. We say [ilmath]\mathcal{B} [/ilmath] is a base or basis for [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] if[1]:

  • [ilmath]\forall U\in\mathcal{J}\exists\{B_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}\subseteq\mathcal{B}[U=\bigcup_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha][/ilmath] - all open sets are unions of elements of [ilmath]\mathcal{B} [/ilmath]

Claim: [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] is smallest topology containing [ilmath]\mathcal{B} [/ilmath]

Suppose [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] is another topology on [ilmath]X[/ilmath] and [ilmath]\mathcal{B}\subseteq\mathcal{K} [/ilmath], then:

  • [ilmath]\mathcal{J}\subseteq\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
    • Caution:I do not see this - YET

Obviously, you can't just pick some random elements of [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] and call them a basis. That leads to the next theorem:

Theorem: Conditions for a collection of sets to be a basis for a topology

A collection, [ilmath]\mathcal{B} [/ilmath] of sets is a base/basis for some topology [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] on [ilmath]\bigcup\mathcal{B} [/ilmath] if and only if:

  • [ilmath]\forall S,T\in\mathcal{B}\forall x\in S\cap T\exists U\in\mathcal{B}[x\in U\subseteq S\cap T][/ilmath]

Terminology: Subbase/subbasis

If [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is an arbitrary family of sets then [ilmath]\mathcal{B} [/ilmath] - the family of all finite intersections of elements of [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath][Note 1] - is a base for a topology, [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] on [ilmath]\bigcup\mathcal{B} [/ilmath].

  • We call [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] a subbase/subbasis for [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath].

Corollary / Claim: subbase/subbasis conditions

The family [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] is a subbase/subbasis for [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] if and only if:

  1. [ilmath]\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] and
  2. For each member of [ilmath]\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] the member is the union of (finite intersections of elements of [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath])

Applications to continuity

Theorem

Suppose [ilmath]f:X\rightarrow Y[/ilmath] is a function between two topological spaces, [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath] and [ilmath](Y,\mathcal{ K })[/ilmath]. Let [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath] be a sub-basis for [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath], then:


TODO: I really need to create the pages that show the pre-image of functions preserves things like unions and intersections


References

  1. Topology - An Introduction with Applications to Topological Groups - George McCarty

Notes

  1. Note that the "convention" of taking the intersection of no sets as the entire set (or union of all of the elements of [ilmath]\mathcal{A} [/ilmath]) and the union of no sets as the empty set mean this is okay