Example:A smooth function that is not real analytic
From Maths
Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Important to do! Needs to be nice and neat before this is removed.
Contents
[hide]Example
Let f:R→R be defined as follows:
- f:x↦{e−1xif x>00otherwise
We will show this function is not real-analytic at 0∈R but is smooth.
Proof
For x<0, f is smooth
This is trivial, as f|R<0\ident0
- TODO: The derivative of a constant is 0, the derivative of that is 0, and so forth - link to corresponding pages
For x>0, f is smooth
We will show a slightly different result.
- Let Pm(y) be a polynomial of order m in the invariant y. pm:R→R is the map with pm:y↦p(y) meaning evaluation at y∈R.
We claim that:
- dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e−1x
Proof
To avoid any potential ambiguities Caveat:I'm not sure whether or not there'd be problems with a 0 degree polynomial, but I want to sidestep it we shall prove this by induction starting from k=1.
The proof shall proceed as follows:
- Show that dfdx=p2(1x)e−1x
- Assume that dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e−1x holds
- Show that (dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e−1x)⟹(dk+1fdxk+1=p2(k+1)(1x)e−1x)
- I.E. show that the RHS of this is true (as by the nature of logical implication if the LHS is true - which we assume it is - then for it to imply the RHS the RHS must also be true.
Proof:
- Remember that here we are explicitly dealing with the x∈R>0 case. We are basically considering f:R>0→R by f:x↦e−1x
- Show that dfdx=p2(1x)e−1x Caveat:I'm experimenting with differentiation notation here[Note 1]
- dfdx|x=ddzez|z=−1x⋅ddx−(x−1)|x=e−1x⋅(−1)⋅ddxx−1|x=x−2e−1x
- We see dfdx=(1x)2e−1x or dfdx=p2(1x)e−1x
- Now we assume dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e−1x
- We attempt to show that (dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e−1x)⟹(dk+1fdxk+1=p2(k+1)(1x)e−1x)
- dk+1fdxk+1=ddx[dkfdxk]x=ddx[p2k(1x)e−1x]=e−1x(ddy[p2k(y)]y=−1x⋅ddx[−x−1])+p2k(1x)⋅ddx[e−1x]
- Well if we differentiate a polynomial of order 2k we get a polynomial of order 2k−1, so: Switching from p to P for the polynomial to make the subscripts more obvious
- dk+1fdxk+1=e−1xP2k−1(1x)⋅x−2+P2k(1x)⋅x−2e−1x =e−1x(P2k−1(1x)⋅x−2+P2k(1x)⋅x−2)
- As x−1=(1x)2 we see:
- dk+1fdxk+1=e−1x(P2k+1(1x)+P2(k+1)(1x)) (note that 2k+2=2(k+1) in the subscript of P)
- Thus: dk+1fdxk+1=P2(k+1)(1x)e−1x - as expected.
- We have shown the induction hypothesis.
- dk+1fdxk+1=ddx[dkfdxk]x=ddx[p2k(1x)e−1x]=e−1x(ddy[p2k(y)]y=−1x⋅ddx[−x−1])+p2k(1x)⋅ddx[e−1x]
Grade: A*
This page requires some work to be carried out
Some aspect of this page is incomplete and work is required to finish it
The message provided is:
The message provided is:
Important work for manifolds, will probably crop up again!
Notes
- Jump up ↑ The details are as follows:
- dfdx is itself a function that takes x′ to dfdx|x=x′
- dfdx|x is another way of writing dfdx - anywhere where the variable we are differentiating with respect to is where we are differentiating at invokes this, and is actually a function in the "at" part.
- dfdx|x=z is an expression for the derivative of f (wrt x) - at z - note that it is an expression - not a constant:
- For example ddxx3|x=t=3t2 so ddtddxx3|x=t|t=6t
- ddt[whatever] to mean ddtwhatever|t
- ddt[whatever]t to mean ddtwhatever|t, and
- ddt[whatever]t=p to mean ddtwhatever|t=p
- ddt[whatever]|t=p for example