Example:A smooth function that is not real analytic

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Important to do! Needs to be nice and neat before this is removed.

Example

Let f:RR be defined as follows:

  • f:x{e1xif x>00otherwise

We will show this function is not real-analytic at 0R but is smooth.

Proof

For x<0, f is smooth

This is trivial, as f|R<0\ident0

  • TODO: The derivative of a constant is 0, the derivative of that is 0, and so forth - link to corresponding pages

For x>0, f is smooth

We will show a slightly different result.

  • Let Pm(y) be a polynomial of order m in the invariant y. pm:RR is the map with pm:yp(y) meaning evaluation at yR.

We claim that:

  • dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e1x

Proof

To avoid any potential ambiguities Caveat:I'm not sure whether or not there'd be problems with a 0 degree polynomial, but I want to sidestep it we shall prove this by induction starting from k=1.

The proof shall proceed as follows:

  1. Show that dfdx=p2(1x)e1x
  2. Assume that dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e1x holds
  3. Show that (dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e1x)(dk+1fdxk+1=p2(k+1)(1x)e1x)
    • I.E. show that the RHS of this is true (as by the nature of logical implication if the LHS is true - which we assume it is - then for it to imply the RHS the RHS must also be true.

Proof:

Remember that here we are explicitly dealing with the xR>0 case. We are basically considering f:R>0R by f:xe1x
  1. Show that dfdx=p2(1x)e1x Caveat:I'm experimenting with differentiation notation here[Note 1]
    • dfdx|x=ddzez|z=1xddx(x1)|x=e1x(1)ddxx1|x=x2e1x
    • We see dfdx=(1x)2e1x or dfdx=p2(1x)e1x
  2. Now we assume dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e1x
  3. We attempt to show that (dkfdxk=p2k(1x)e1x)(dk+1fdxk+1=p2(k+1)(1x)e1x)
    • dk+1fdxk+1=ddx[dkfdxk]x=ddx[p2k(1x)e1x]=e1x(ddy[p2k(y)]y=1xddx[x1])+p2k(1x)ddx[e1x]
      • Well if we differentiate a polynomial of order 2k we get a polynomial of order 2k1, so: Switching from p to P for the polynomial to make the subscripts more obvious
    • dk+1fdxk+1=e1xP2k1(1x)x2+P2k(1x)x2e1x =e1x(P2k1(1x)x2+P2k(1x)x2)
      • As x1=(1x)2 we see:
    • dk+1fdxk+1=e1x(P2k+1(1x)+P2(k+1)(1x)) (note that 2k+2=2(k+1) in the subscript of P)
    • Thus: dk+1fdxk+1=P2(k+1)(1x)e1x - as expected.
    • We have shown the induction hypothesis.
Grade: A*
This page requires some work to be carried out
Some aspect of this page is incomplete and work is required to finish it
The message provided is:
Important work for manifolds, will probably crop up again!

Notes

  1. Jump up The details are as follows:
    • dfdx is itself a function that takes x to dfdx|x=x
    • dfdx|x is another way of writing dfdx - anywhere where the variable we are differentiating with respect to is where we are differentiating at invokes this, and is actually a function in the "at" part.
    • dfdx|x=z is an expression for the derivative of f (wrt x) - at z - note that it is an expression - not a constant:
      • For example ddxx3|x=t=3t2 so ddtddxx3|x=t|t=6t
    We may also use:
    • ddt[whatever] to mean ddtwhatever|t
    • ddt[whatever]t to mean ddtwhatever|t, and
    • ddt[whatever]t=p to mean ddtwhatever|t=p
    Rather than:
    • ddt[whatever]|t=p for example

References