Axiom of completeness

From Maths
Revision as of 13:59, 2 June 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=B|msg=Demote to grade C once fleshed out better}} <br/> : {{Caution|This is a really badly named property of the real numbers, although first years are often...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: B
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Demote to grade C once fleshed out better


Caution:This is a really badly named property of the real numbers, although first years are often given it as if it were an axiom but it can actually be proved if one constructs the real numbers "properly"

Statement

If [ilmath]S\subseteq\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] is a non-empty set of real numbers that has an upper bound then[1]:

  • [ilmath]\text{Sup}(S)[/ilmath] (the supremum of [ilmath]S[/ilmath]) exists.

Proof

(Unknown grade)
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).

References

  1. Functional Analysis - Volume 1: A gentle introduction - Dzung Minh Ha