Subspace topology
The message provided is:
Contents
[hide]Definition
Let (X,J) be a topological space and let S∈P(X)[Note 1] be given. We can construct a new topological space, (S,JS) where the topology JS is known as "the subspace topology on S"[1] (AKA: relative topology on S[1]) and is defined as follows:
- JS:={U∩S | U∈J} - the open sets of (S,JS) are precisely the intersection of open sets of (X,J) with S
Alternatively:
- Claim 2: ∀U∈P(S)[U∈JS⟺∃V∈J[U=S∩V]][1]
Terminology
- Let U∈P(S) be given. For clarity rather than saying U is open, or U is closed (which is surprisingly ambiguous when using subspaces) we instead say:
- U is relatively open[1] - indicating we mean open in the subspace, or
- U is relatively closed[1] - indicating we mean closed in the subspace
TODO: Closed and open subspace terminology, For example if S∈P(X) is closed with respect to the topology J on X, then we call S imbued with the subspace topology a closed subspace
Characteristic property
- Given any topological space (Y,K) and any map f:Y→S we have:
- (f:Y→S is continuous)⟺(iS∘f:Y→X is continuous)
Where iS:S→X given by iS:s↦s is the canonical injection of the subspace topology (which is itself continuous)[Note 3]
Proof of claims
Claim 1: JS is a topology
The message provided is:
This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof
Claim 2: Equivalent formulation of the relatively open sets
The message provided is:
This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof
See next
TODO: Theorems and propositions involving subspaces
See also
TODO: Link to more things
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Recall P(X) denotes the power set of X and S∈P(X)⟺S⊆X, so it's another way of saying let S be a subset of X, possibly empty, possibly equal to X itself
- Jump up ↑ This means S∈P(X), or S⊆X of course
- Jump up ↑ This leads to two ways to prove the statement:
- If we show iS:S→X is continuous, then we can use the composition of continuous maps is continuous to show if f continuous then so is iS∘f
- We can show the property the "long way" and then show iS:S→X is continuous as a corollary
References
|
OLD PAGE
Definition
Given a topological space (X,J) and given a Y⊂X (Y is a subset of X) we define the subspace topology as follows:[1]
- (Y,K) is a topological space where the open sets, K, are given by K:={Y∩V| V∈J}
We may say any one of:
- Let Y be a subspace of X
- Let Y be a subspace of (X,J)
and it is taken implicitly to mean Y is considered as a topological space with the subspace topology inherited from (X,J)
Proof of claims
Claim 1: The subspace topology is indeed a topology
Terminology
- A closed subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is closed in X and is imbued with the subspace topology
- A open subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is open in X and is imbued with the subspace topology
TODO: Find reference
- A set U⊆X is open relative to Y (or relatively open if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is open in Y
- This implies that U⊆Y[1]
- A set U⊆X is closed relative to Y (or relatively closed if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is closed in Y
- This also implies that U⊆Y
Immediate theorems
Theorem: Let Y be a subspace of X, if U is open in Y and Y is open in X then U is open in X[1]
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Topology - Second Edition - Munkres