Talk:Extending pre-measures to outer-measures
Proving it extends problem
(These notes are being made before bed) The problem I'm having is showing ˉμ(A)≤μ∗(A), I have worked out I need to do something involving two infimums. I know that for A\in\mathcal{R} and a ({ A_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }\subseteq \mathcal{R} such that A\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n we have \bar{\mu}(A)\le\sum^\infty_{n=1}\bar{\mu}(A_n). However we have:
- \mu^*(A):=\text{inf}\underbrace{\left\{\left.\sum^\infty_{n=1}\bar{\mu}(A_n)\right\vert (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\wedge A\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}A_n^\infty\right\} }_{\text{exactly the conditions for }\bar{\mu}(A)\le\sum^\infty_{n=1}\bar{\mu}(A_n) }
But I am struggling to form a statement along the lines of "if we have a set which has members \le every member in \left\{\left.\sum^\infty_{n=1}\bar{\mu}(A_n)\right\vert (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\wedge A\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}A_n^\infty\right\} how can I show the \text{inf} of that set is \le the \text{inf} of \left\{\left.\sum^\infty_{n=1}\bar{\mu}(A_n)\right\vert (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\wedge A\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}A_n^\infty\right\}?" I remember doing this once before. I cannot recall what I did. A nudge in the right direction would be useful. Oh wait. I may have just got it. If I use the "epsilon definition" of an infimum which is something like (for a=\text{inf}(X)):
- \forall x\in X[a\le x] AND
- \forall\epsilon>0\exists y\in X[a+\epsilon>y]
(I'm nearly falling asleep) then I can probably combine this with the epsilon-version of Greater than or equal to Alec (talk) 23:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)