Equivalence class
Contents
[hide]Definition
Given an Equivalence relation ∼ the equivalence class of a is denoted as follows:
[a]={b|a∼b}
Notations
An equivalence class may be denoted by [a] where a is the representative of it. There is an alternative representation:
- ˆa, where again a is the representative of the class.[1]
I quite like the hat notation, however I recommend one avoids using it when there are multiple Equivalence relations at play.
If there are multiple ones, then we can write for example [a]∼1 for a class in ∼1 and [f]∼2 for ∼2
Equivalence relations partition sets
An equivalence relation is a partition
Equivalence classes are either the same or disjoint
Suppose there were two equivalence classes [a] and [b]. We can write the members of each class as [an] and [bn].
Suppose the two classes were both nonidentical and nondisjoint. Then there exists [a1]∼[b1] and [a_2] \nsim [b_2]. However, [a_1] \sim [a_2] and [b_1] \sim [b_2], thus [a_2] \sim [b_2], a contradiction. Therefore the classes must be either identical or disjoint.
This is the motivation for how cosets partition groups.
References
- Jump up ↑ Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici
TODO: Add proofs and whatnot