Difference between revisions of "Subspace topology"
m |
(Updated page to site style.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
− | + | Given a [[Topological space|topological space]] {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} and given a {{M|Y\subset X}} ({{M|Y}} is a subset of {{M|X}}) we define the ''subspace topology'' as follows:<ref name="Topology">Topology - Second Edition - Munkres</ref> | |
+ | * {{M|(Y,\mathcal{K})}} is a topological space where the [[Open set|open sets]], {{M|\mathcal{K} }}, are given by {{M|1=\mathcal{K}:=\{Y\cap V\vert\ V\in\mathcal{J}\} }} | ||
+ | We may say any one of: | ||
+ | # Let {{M|Y}} be a subspace of {{M|X}} | ||
+ | # Let {{M|Y}} be a subspace of {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} | ||
+ | and it is taken implicitly to mean {{M|Y}} is considered as a topological space with the ''subspace topology'' inherited from {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} | ||
− | + | ==Proof of claims== | |
+ | {{Begin Theorem}} | ||
+ | Claim 1: The subspace topology is indeed a topology | ||
+ | {{Begin Proof}} | ||
+ | Here {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} is a topological space and {{M|Y\subset X}} and {{M|\mathcal{K} }} is defined as above, we will prove that {{M|(Y,\mathcal{K})}} is a topology. | ||
− | |||
− | + | Recall that to be a topology {{M|(Y,\mathcal{K})}} must have the following properties: | |
− | + | # {{M|\emptyset\in\mathcal{K} }} and {{M|Y\in\mathcal{K} }} | |
+ | # For any {{M|U,V\in\mathcal{K} }} we must have {{M|U\cap V\in\mathcal{K} }} | ||
+ | # For an [[Indexing set|arbitrary family]] {{M|\{U_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I} }} of open sets (that is {{M|\forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{K}]}}) we have: | ||
+ | #* {{MM|\bigcup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha\in\mathcal{K} }} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | == | + | '''Proof:''' |
− | {{ | + | # First we must show that {{M|\emptyset,Y\in\mathcal{K} }} |
+ | #: Recall that {{M|\emptyset,X\in\mathcal{J} }} and notice that: | ||
+ | #:* {{M|1=\emptyset\cap Y=\emptyset}}, so by the definition of {{M|\mathcal{K} }} we have {{M|\emptyset\in\mathcal{K} }} | ||
+ | #:* {{M|1=X\cap Y=Y}}, so by the definition of {{M|\mathcal{K} }} we have {{M|Y\in\mathcal{K} }} | ||
+ | # Next we must show... | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Todo|Easy work just takes time to write!}} | ||
+ | {{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Terminology== | ||
+ | * A '''closed subspace''' (of {{M|X}}) is a subset of {{M|X}} which is closed in {{M|X}} and is imbued with the subspace topology | ||
+ | * A '''open subspace''' (of {{M|X}}) is a subset of {{M|X}} which is open in {{M|X}} and is imbued with the subspace topology | ||
+ | {{Todo|Find reference}} | ||
+ | * A set {{M|U\subseteq X}} is '''open relative to {{M|Y}}''' (or [[Relatively open|''relatively open'']] if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace {{M|Y}} of {{M|X}}) if {{M|U}} is open in {{M|Y}} | ||
+ | ** This implies that {{M|U\subseteq Y}}<ref name="Topology"/> | ||
+ | * A set {{M|U\subseteq X}} is '''closed relative to {{M|Y}}''' (or [[Relatively closed|''relatively closed'']] if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace {{M|Y}} of {{M|X}}) if {{M|U}} is [[Closed set|closed]] in {{M|Y}} | ||
+ | ** This also implies that {{M|U\subseteq Y}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Immediate theorems== | ||
+ | {{Begin Theorem}} | ||
+ | Theorem: Let {{M|Y}} be a subspace of {{M|X}}, if {{M|U}} is open in {{M|Y}} and {{M|Y}} is open in {{M|X}} then {{M|U}} is open in {{M|X}}<ref name="Topology"/> | ||
+ | {{Begin Proof}} | ||
+ | This may be easier to read symbolically: | ||
+ | * if {{M|U\in\mathcal{K} }} and {{M|Y\in\mathcal{J} }} then {{M|U\in\mathcal{J} }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Proof:''' | ||
+ | : Since {{M|U}} is open in {{M|Y}} we know that: | ||
+ | :* {{M|1=U=Y\cap V}} for some {{M|V}} open in {{M|X}} (for some {{M|V\in\mathcal{J} }}) | ||
+ | : Since {{M|Y}} and {{M|V}} are both open in {{M|X}} we know: | ||
+ | :* {{M|Y\cap V}} is open in {{M|X}} | ||
+ | : it follows that {{M|U}} is open in {{M|X}} | ||
+ | {{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | <references/> | ||
{{Definition|Topology}} | {{Definition|Topology}} |
Revision as of 03:12, 22 June 2015
Definition
Given a topological space [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] and given a [ilmath]Y\subset X[/ilmath] ([ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is a subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]) we define the subspace topology as follows:[1]
- [ilmath](Y,\mathcal{K})[/ilmath] is a topological space where the open sets, [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath], are given by [ilmath]\mathcal{K}:=\{Y\cap V\vert\ V\in\mathcal{J}\}[/ilmath]
We may say any one of:
- Let [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] be a subspace of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]
- Let [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] be a subspace of [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath]
and it is taken implicitly to mean [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is considered as a topological space with the subspace topology inherited from [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath]
Proof of claims
Claim 1: The subspace topology is indeed a topology
Here [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] is a topological space and [ilmath]Y\subset X[/ilmath] and [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] is defined as above, we will prove that [ilmath](Y,\mathcal{K})[/ilmath] is a topology.
Recall that to be a topology [ilmath](Y,\mathcal{K})[/ilmath] must have the following properties:
- [ilmath]\emptyset\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] and [ilmath]Y\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
- For any [ilmath]U,V\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] we must have [ilmath]U\cap V\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
- For an arbitrary family [ilmath]\{U_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I} [/ilmath] of open sets (that is [ilmath]\forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{K}][/ilmath]) we have:
- [math]\bigcup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha\in\mathcal{K} [/math]
Proof:
- First we must show that [ilmath]\emptyset,Y\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
- Recall that [ilmath]\emptyset,X\in\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] and notice that:
- [ilmath]\emptyset\cap Y=\emptyset[/ilmath], so by the definition of [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] we have [ilmath]\emptyset\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
- [ilmath]X\cap Y=Y[/ilmath], so by the definition of [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] we have [ilmath]Y\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
- Recall that [ilmath]\emptyset,X\in\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] and notice that:
- Next we must show...
TODO: Easy work just takes time to write!
Terminology
- A closed subspace (of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]) is a subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath] which is closed in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] and is imbued with the subspace topology
- A open subspace (of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]) is a subset of [ilmath]X[/ilmath] which is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] and is imbued with the subspace topology
TODO: Find reference
- A set [ilmath]U\subseteq X[/ilmath] is open relative to [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] (or relatively open if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]) if [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath]
- This implies that [ilmath]U\subseteq Y[/ilmath][1]
- A set [ilmath]U\subseteq X[/ilmath] is closed relative to [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] (or relatively closed if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] of [ilmath]X[/ilmath]) if [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is closed in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath]
- This also implies that [ilmath]U\subseteq Y[/ilmath]
Immediate theorems
Theorem: Let [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] be a subspace of [ilmath]X[/ilmath], if [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] and [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] then [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath][1]
This may be easier to read symbolically:
- if [ilmath]U\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] and [ilmath]Y\in\mathcal{J} [/ilmath] then [ilmath]U\in\mathcal{J} [/ilmath]
Proof:
- Since [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] we know that:
- [ilmath]U=Y\cap V[/ilmath] for some [ilmath]V[/ilmath] open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] (for some [ilmath]V\in\mathcal{J} [/ilmath])
- Since [ilmath]Y[/ilmath] and [ilmath]V[/ilmath] are both open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath] we know:
- [ilmath]Y\cap V[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath]
- it follows that [ilmath]U[/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath]