Difference between revisions of "Circular motion/Notes"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Acceleration== * {{MM|a(t)\eq p(t)\cdot\left(\frac{r' '(t)}{r(t)}-(\theta'(t))^2\right)+\big(\theta' '(t)\cdot r(t)+2\theta'(t)\cdot r'(t)\big)\cdot\left[\begin{array}{r}-\s...")
 
m
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
#** But notice:
 
#** But notice:
 
#*** {{M|a(t)\eq \theta' '(t)\left(\left[r(t)sin(θ(t))r(t)cos(θ(t))
\right]-\theta' '(t)\cdot p(t)\right)}}
 
#*** {{M|a(t)\eq \theta' '(t)\left(\left[r(t)sin(θ(t))r(t)cos(θ(t))
\right]-\theta' '(t)\cdot p(t)\right)}}
#***: {{M|\eq \theta' '(t)\left(\left[\begin{array}{r} -p_x(t)\\p_y(t)\end{array}\right]-\theta' '(t)\cdot p(t)\right)}}
+
#***: {{M|\eq \theta' '(t)\left(\left[\begin{array}{r} -p_y(t)\\p_x(t)\end{array}\right]-\theta' '(t)\cdot p(t)\right)}}
 
There must be a geometric interpretation for this! As the vector here is {{M|p(t)}} reflected in the line {{M|x\eq 0}}!
 
There must be a geometric interpretation for this! As the vector here is {{M|p(t)}} reflected in the line {{M|x\eq 0}}!
 +
* {{XXX|This is wrong actually}} as the {{M|x}} component comes from cos in {{M|p(t)}}, not sin. Which is not a reflection in {{M|x\eq 0}}, a matrix might be able to represent this linear combination better
 +
** I've corrected the formula [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 18:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:56, 13 September 2018

Acceleration

  • a(t)=p(t)(r(t)r(t)(θ(t))2)+(θ(t)r(t)+2θ(t)r(t))[sin(θ(t))cos(θ(t))]
    , or:
    • substituting in p(t) by it's definition:
      • a(t)=(r(t)r(t)(θ(t))2)[r(t)cos(θ(t))r(t)sin(θ(t))]+(θ(t)r(t)+2θ(t)r(t))[sin(θ(t))cos(θ(t))]
      • However in many special cases it is useful to consider the first form with p(t) in it.

Special cases

  1. unchanging radius, r(t):=r0R>0
    • obviously, now r(t)=0 and r(t)=0, thus:
      • a(t)=(θ(t))2p(t)+(θ(t)r(t))[sin(θ(t))cos(θ(t))]
        =θ(t)(r(t)[sin(θ(t))cos(θ(t))]θ(t)p(t))
      • But notice:
        • a(t)=θ(t)([r(t)sin(θ(t))r(t)cos(θ(t))]θ(t)p(t))
          =θ(t)([py(t)px(t)]θ(t)p(t))

There must be a geometric interpretation for this! As the vector here is p(t) reflected in the line x=0!

  • TODO: This is wrong actually
    as the x component comes from cos in p(t), not sin. Which is not a reflection in x=0, a matrix might be able to represent this linear combination better
    • I've corrected the formula Alec (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)