Difference between revisions of "User:Harold/Charting RP^n"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</m> | </m> | ||
This article contains information on possible {{link|chart||s}} for the real projective space of dimension <m>n</m>, denoted by <m>\RPn</m>. | This article contains information on possible {{link|chart||s}} for the real projective space of dimension <m>n</m>, denoted by <m>\RPn</m>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Definition of {{M|\RPn}} == | ||
We shall first define <m>\RPn</m>. Let <m>S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\}</m> be the <m>n</m>-sphere. | We shall first define <m>\RPn</m>. Let <m>S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\}</m> be the <m>n</m>-sphere. | ||
Define a group action <m>\{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo</m> on <m>S^n</m> by mapping <m>(\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x</m> with <m>\epsilon \in \{-1, 1\}</m> and <m>x \in S^n</m>. | Define a group action <m>\{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo</m> on <m>S^n</m> by mapping <m>(\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x</m> with <m>\epsilon \in \{-1, 1\}</m> and <m>x \in S^n</m>. | ||
This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space <m>S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) </m> is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold. | This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space <m>S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) </m> is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold. | ||
+ | == Construction of the charts == | ||
We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on {{M|\RPn}}. | We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on {{M|\RPn}}. | ||
First we introduce some notation: if {{M|x \in \RPn}}, we write {{M|1=x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n]}} if {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_n)}} is a representative of the equivalence class {{M|x}}. | First we introduce some notation: if {{M|x \in \RPn}}, we write {{M|1=x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n]}} if {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_n)}} is a representative of the equivalence class {{M|x}}. | ||
Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on {{M|\RPn}}, and actually define a smooth structure on {{M|\RPn}}, as the transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are diffeomorphisms (where defined). | These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on {{M|\RPn}}, and actually define a smooth structure on {{M|\RPn}}, as the transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are diffeomorphisms (where defined). | ||
+ | == On the transition maps == | ||
The transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are defined on {{M| \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}. | The transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are defined on {{M| \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}. | ||
They are explicitly given by mapping {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}} to {{M|[x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n]}} under {{M| \phi^{-1} }}, and then mapping {{M|[x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] \eq \left[\frac{x_0}{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_{i - 1} }{x_j} : \frac{1}{x_j} : \frac{x_{i+1} }{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_n}{x_j} \right] }} to {{M| \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} }}. | They are explicitly given by mapping {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}} to {{M|[x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n]}} under {{M| \phi^{-1} }}, and then mapping {{M|[x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] \eq \left[\frac{x_0}{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_{i - 1} }{x_j} : \frac{1}{x_j} : \frac{x_{i+1} }{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_n}{x_j} \right] }} to {{M| \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} }}. | ||
This explicit expression makes it obvious that the transition maps are smooth, and they are obviously invertible, with smooth inverse. As such, they are diffeomorphisms from {{M|\phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}. | This explicit expression makes it obvious that the transition maps are smooth, and they are obviously invertible, with smooth inverse. As such, they are diffeomorphisms from {{M|\phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}. |
Revision as of 16:14, 19 February 2017
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\RPn}{\R P^n} \newcommand{\Ztwo}{\mathbb{Z} / 2 \mathbb{Z}} This article contains information on possible charts for the real projective space of dimension n, denoted by \RPn.
Definition of \RPn
We shall first define \RPn. Let S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\} be the n-sphere. Define a group action \{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo on S^n by mapping (\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x with \epsilon \in \{-1, 1\} and x \in S^n. This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold.
Construction of the charts
We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on \RPn. First we introduce some notation: if x \in \RPn, we write x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] if (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) is a representative of the equivalence class x. Define the subsets U_i \subset \RPn for 0 \leq i \leq n as U_i := \{ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] \in \RPn \vert x_i \neq 0 \}. This is well-defined, because the choice of representative only depends on a sign or a non-zero scalar multiple (if the definition of lines in \R^n is chosen; see Real projective space). Now introduce maps
\begin{align*} \phi_i: U_i & \to \R^n \\ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] & \mapsto (x_0, \dotsc, \widehat{x_i}, \dotsc, x_n) \end{align*}
where \widehat{x_i} denotes that the i-th coordinate is omitted. These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on \RPn, and actually define a smooth structure on \RPn, as the transition maps \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} are diffeomorphisms (where defined).
On the transition maps
The transition maps \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} are defined on \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j). They are explicitly given by mapping (x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n) to [x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] under \phi^{-1} , and then mapping [x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] \eq \left[\frac{x_0}{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_{i - 1} }{x_j} : \frac{1}{x_j} : \frac{x_{i+1} }{x_j} : \dotsc : \frac{x_n}{x_j} \right] to \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} . This explicit expression makes it obvious that the transition maps are smooth, and they are obviously invertible, with smooth inverse. As such, they are diffeomorphisms from \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j).