Difference between revisions of "Integral (measure theory)"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Stub page}} __TOC__ ==Definition== Given a measure space, {{M|(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)}} and a function {{M|f:X\rightarrow\bar{\mathbb{R} } }}, we say that {{M|f}} is ''{{M|\...")
 
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==[[Integral of a positive function (measure theory)|Integration of positive functions]]==
 
==[[Integral of a positive function (measure theory)|Integration of positive functions]]==
 
{{:Integral of a positive function (measure theory)/Definition}}
 
{{:Integral of a positive function (measure theory)/Definition}}
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references group="Note"/>
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
{{Measure theory navbox|plain}}
 
{{Measure theory navbox|plain}}
 
{{Definition|Measure Theory}}
 
{{Definition|Measure Theory}}

Revision as of 05:46, 13 March 2016

(Unknown grade)
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.

Definition

Given a measure space, [ilmath](X,\mathcal{A},\mu)[/ilmath] and a function [ilmath]f:X\rightarrow\bar{\mathbb{R} } [/ilmath], we say that [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is [ilmath]\mu[/ilmath]-integrable if[1]:

  • [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is a measurable map, an [ilmath]\mathcal{A}/\bar{\mathcal{B} } [/ilmath]-measurable map; and if
  • The integrals [ilmath]\int f^+\mathrm{d}\mu,\ \int f^-\mathrm{d}\mu<\infty[/ilmath], then:

We define the [ilmath]\mu[/ilmath]-integral of [ilmath]f[/ilmath] to be:

  • [math]\int f\mathrm{d}u:=\int f^+\mathrm{d}\mu-\int f^-\mathrm{d}\mu[/math]

Where:

Integration of positive functions

Let [ilmath](X,\mathcal{A},\mu)[/ilmath] be a measure space, the [ilmath]\mu[/ilmath]-integral of a positive numerical function, [ilmath]f\in\mathcal{M}^+_{\bar{\mathbb{R} } }(\mathcal{A}) [/ilmath][Note 1][Note 2] is[1]:

  • [math]\int f\mathrm{d}\mu:=\text{Sup}\left\{I_\mu(g)\ \Big\vert\ g\le f, g\in\mathcal{E}^+(\mathcal{A})\right\}[/math][Note 3]

Recall that:

Notes

  1. So [ilmath]f:X\rightarrow\bar{\mathbb{R} }^+[/ilmath]
  2. Notice that [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is [ilmath]\mathcal{A}/\bar{\mathcal{B} } [/ilmath]-measurable by definition, as [ilmath]\mathcal{M}_\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{A})[/ilmath] denotes all the measurable functions that are [ilmath]\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{Z} [/ilmath]-measurable, we just use the [ilmath]+[/ilmath] as a slight abuse of notation to denote all the positive ones (with respect to the standard order on [ilmath]\bar{\mathbb{R} } [/ilmath] - the extended reals)
  3. The [ilmath]g\le f[/ilmath] is an abuse of notation for saying that [ilmath]g[/ilmath] is everywhere less than [ilmath]f[/ilmath], we could have written:
    • [math]\int f\mathrm{d}\mu=\text{Sup}\left\{I_\mu(g)\ \Big\vert\ g\le f, g\in\mathcal{E}^+\right\}=\text{Sup}\left\{I_\mu(g)\ \Big\vert\ g\in\left\{h\in\mathcal{E}^+(\mathcal{A})\ \big\vert\ \forall x\in X\left(h(x)\le f(x)\right)\right\}\right\}[/math] instead.
    Inline with: Notation for dealing with (extended) real-valued measurable maps

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Measures, Integrals and Martingales - René L. Schilling