Difference between revisions of "User:Harold/Charting RP^n"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(introduced the charts)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
\newcommand{\RPn}{\R P^n}
 
\newcommand{\RPn}{\R P^n}
 
\newcommand{\Ztwo}{\mathbb{Z} / 2 \mathbb{Z}}
 
\newcommand{\Ztwo}{\mathbb{Z} / 2 \mathbb{Z}}
 +
\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{Id}}
 
</m>
 
</m>
 
This article contains information on possible {{link|chart||s}} for the real projective space of dimension <m>n</m>, denoted by <m>\RPn</m>.
 
This article contains information on possible {{link|chart||s}} for the real projective space of dimension <m>n</m>, denoted by <m>\RPn</m>.
 +
 +
== Definition of {{M|\RPn}} ==
 
We shall first define <m>\RPn</m>. Let <m>S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\}</m> be the <m>n</m>-sphere.
 
We shall first define <m>\RPn</m>. Let <m>S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\}</m> be the <m>n</m>-sphere.
 
Define a group action <m>\{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo</m> on <m>S^n</m> by mapping <m>(\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x</m> with <m>\epsilon \in \{-1, 1\}</m> and <m>x \in S^n</m>.
 
Define a group action <m>\{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo</m> on <m>S^n</m> by mapping <m>(\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x</m> with <m>\epsilon \in \{-1, 1\}</m> and <m>x \in S^n</m>.
 
This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space <m>S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) </m> is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold.
 
This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space <m>S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) </m> is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold.
  
 +
== Construction of the charts ==
 
We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on {{M|\RPn}}.  
 
We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on {{M|\RPn}}.  
 
First we introduce some notation: if {{M|x \in \RPn}}, we write {{M|1=x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n]}} if {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_n)}} is a representative of the equivalence class {{M|x}}.  
 
First we introduce some notation: if {{M|x \in \RPn}}, we write {{M|1=x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n]}} if {{M|(x_0, \dotsc, x_n)}} is a representative of the equivalence class {{M|x}}.  
 
Define the subsets {{M|U_i \subset \RPn}} for {{M|0 \leq i \leq n}} as
 
Define the subsets {{M|U_i \subset \RPn}} for {{M|0 \leq i \leq n}} as
 
{{MM|1=U_i := \{ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] \in \RPn \vert x_i \neq 0 \}. }}
 
{{MM|1=U_i := \{ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] \in \RPn \vert x_i \neq 0 \}. }}
This is well-defined, because the choice of representative only depends on a sign or a non-zero scalar multiple (if the definition of lines in {{M|\R^n}} is chosen; see {{link|Real projective space}}).
+
This is well-defined, because the choice of representative only depends on a sign or a non-zero scalar multiple (if the definition of lines in {{M|\R^{n+1} }} is chosen; see {{link|Real projective space}}).
 
Now introduce maps  
 
Now introduce maps  
  
Line 25: Line 29:
 
where {{M| \widehat{x_i} }} denotes that the {{M|i}}-th coordinate is omitted.  
 
where {{M| \widehat{x_i} }} denotes that the {{M|i}}-th coordinate is omitted.  
 
These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on {{M|\RPn}}, and actually define a smooth structure on {{M|\RPn}}, as the transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are diffeomorphisms (where defined).
 
These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on {{M|\RPn}}, and actually define a smooth structure on {{M|\RPn}}, as the transition maps {{M| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} }} are diffeomorphisms (where defined).
 +
 +
== On the transition maps ==
 +
We obtain the following transition maps:
 +
* Let {{M| i,j \in\{1,\ldots,n\}\subseteq\mathbb{N} }} be given.
 +
** In general the transition maps have the form: {{M| (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1}) : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}.
 +
** We obtain the transition map by [[case analysis]], as follows:
 +
**# {{M|i\eq j}} - in this case, the transition map is the identity map {{M| (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}): \underbrace{\phi_i(U_i \cap U_i)}_{\eq \R^n} \to \underbrace{\phi_i(U_i \cap U_i)}_{\eq \R^n} }} given by {{M| (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}) : x \mapsto x }}. Note that this is just the identity, i.e., we have {{M| (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}) \eq \id_{\R^n} }}.
 +
**# {{M|i<j}} - we obtain the following map:
 +
**#* {{MM| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}} given by {{MM| (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1})(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n) \eq \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} }}.
 +
**# {{M|i>j}} - we obtain the following map:
 +
**#* {{MM| \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}} given by {{MM| (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1})(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n) \eq \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} }}.
 +
** This completes our case analysis
 +
* Since {{M|i,j}} were arbitrary we have shown this for all.
 +
* These explicit expressions makes it obvious that the transition maps are smooth, and they are obviously invertible, with smooth inverse. As such, they are diffeomorphisms from {{M|\phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j)}}.

Latest revision as of 16:50, 19 February 2017

\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\RPn}{\R P^n} \newcommand{\Ztwo}{\mathbb{Z} / 2 \mathbb{Z}} \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{Id}} This article contains information on possible charts for the real projective space of dimension n, denoted by \RPn.

Definition of \RPn

We shall first define \RPn. Let S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) \middle\vert \sum_{i = 0}^n x_i^2 = 1 \right\} be the n-sphere. Define a group action \{-1, 1\} \cong \Ztwo on S^n by mapping (\epsilon, x) \mapsto \epsilon x with \epsilon \in \{-1, 1\} and x \in S^n. This group action is "nice enough" so that the quotient space S^n / \left( \Ztwo \right) is actually a real smooth compact Hausdorff manifold.

Construction of the charts

We now construct (the) (smooth) charts on \RPn. First we introduce some notation: if x \in \RPn, we write x = [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] if (x_0, \dotsc, x_n) is a representative of the equivalence class x. Define the subsets U_i \subset \RPn for 0 \leq i \leq n as U_i := \{ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_n] \in \RPn \vert x_i \neq 0 \}. This is well-defined, because the choice of representative only depends on a sign or a non-zero scalar multiple (if the definition of lines in \R^{n+1} is chosen; see Real projective space). Now introduce maps

\begin{align*} \phi_i: U_i & \to \R^n \\ [x_0 : \dotsc : x_{i - 1} : 1 : x_{i+1} : \dotsc : x_n] & \mapsto (x_0, \dotsc, \widehat{x_i}, \dotsc, x_n) \end{align*}

where \widehat{x_i} denotes that the i-th coordinate is omitted. These maps are well-defined, and homeomorphisms if one takes the quotient topology on \RPn, and actually define a smooth structure on \RPn, as the transition maps \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} are diffeomorphisms (where defined).

On the transition maps

We obtain the following transition maps:

  • Let i,j \in\{1,\ldots,n\}\subseteq\mathbb{N} be given.
    • In general the transition maps have the form: (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1}) : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j).
    • We obtain the transition map by case analysis, as follows:
      1. i\eq j - in this case, the transition map is the identity map (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}): \underbrace{\phi_i(U_i \cap U_i)}_{\eq \R^n} \to \underbrace{\phi_i(U_i \cap U_i)}_{\eq \R^n} given by (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}) : x \mapsto x . Note that this is just the identity, i.e., we have (\phi_i \circ \phi_i^{-1}) \eq \id_{\R^n} .
      2. i<j - we obtain the following map:
        • \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j) given by (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1})(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n) \eq \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} .
      3. i>j - we obtain the following map:
        • \phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1} : \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j) given by (\phi_j \circ \phi_i^{-1})(x_0, \dotsc, x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n) \eq \frac{(x_0, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_{i - 1}, 1, x_{i+1}, \dotsc, x_n)}{x_j} .
    • This completes our case analysis
  • Since i,j were arbitrary we have shown this for all.
  • These explicit expressions makes it obvious that the transition maps are smooth, and they are obviously invertible, with smooth inverse. As such, they are diffeomorphisms from \phi_i(U_i \cap U_j) \to \phi_j(U_i \cap U_j).