Difference between revisions of "Quotient topology"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<math>\require{AMScd}</math>
 
<math>\begin{equation}\begin{CD}
 
S^{{\mathcal{W}}_\Lambda}\otimes T @>j>> T\\
 
@VVV @VV{\End P}V\\
 
(S\otimes T)/I @= (Z\otimes T)/J
 
\end{CD}\end{equation}</math>
 
 
 
==Quotient map==
 
==Quotient map==
 
Let {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} and {{M|(Y,\mathcal{K})}} be [[Topological space|topological spaces]] and let {{M|p:X\rightarrow Y}} be a [[Surjection|surjective]] map.
 
Let {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}} and {{M|(Y,\mathcal{K})}} be [[Topological space|topological spaces]] and let {{M|p:X\rightarrow Y}} be a [[Surjection|surjective]] map.

Revision as of 09:22, 7 April 2015

Quotient map

Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces and let p:XY be a surjective map.


p is a quotient map[1] if we have UKp1(U)J

Notes

Stronger than continuity

If we had K={,Y} then p is automatically continuous (as it is surjective), the point is that K is the largest topology we can define on Y such that p is continuous


See Motivation for quotient topology for a discussion on where this goes.

Definition

If (X,J) is a topological space, A is a set, and p:(X,J)A is a surjective map then there exists exactly one topology JQ relative to which p is a quotient map. This is the quotient topology induced by p



TODO: Munkres page 138



References

  1. Jump up Topology - Second Edition - James R Munkres