Difference between revisions of "User:Alec/Bitchin"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added some arrows)
(Fleshed out)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Dispute==
 +
<div style="float:right;margin:0px;margin-left:0.2em">
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1" style="overflow:hidden;max-width:35em;"
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1" style="overflow:hidden;max-width:35em;"
 
|-
 
|-
Line 5: Line 7:
 
}</mm></span></center>
 
}</mm></span></center>
 
|-
 
|-
! Here it is
+
! Set up
 
|}
 
|}
 +
</div>If {{M|f}} is say {{M|\partial_n:C_n(X)\rightarrow C_{n-1}(Y)}} in a [[chain complex]] (found in this case in [[singular homology theory]]) it is claimed that for any [[topological subspace]] of {{M|X}} that {{M|f}} induces a [[map]]:
 +
* {{M|f':\frac{C_n(X)}{C_n(A)}\rightarrow\frac{C_{n-1}(X)}{C_{n-1}(A)} }}
 +
Specifically it is claimed that:
 +
* {{M|\text{Ker}(\pi_1)\subseteq \text{Ker}(f)}}
 +
But I don't yet see how that helps. [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:23, 14 February 2017

Dispute

Set up
If f is say n:Cn(X)Cn1(Y) in a chain complex (found in this case in singular homology theory) it is claimed that for any topological subspace of X that f induces a map:
  • f:Cn(X)Cn(A)Cn1(X)Cn1(A)

Specifically it is claimed that:

  • Ker(π1)Ker(f)

But I don't yet see how that helps. Alec (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)