Difference between revisions of "Equivalence class"

Latest revision as of 20:00, 14 November 2015

Definition

Given an Equivalence relation [ilmath]\sim[/ilmath] the equivalence class of [ilmath]a[/ilmath] is denoted as follows:

[math][a]=\{b|a\sim b\}[/math]

Notations

An equivalence class may be denoted by [ilmath][a][/ilmath] where [ilmath]a[/ilmath] is the representative of it. There is an alternative representation:

• [ilmath]\hat{a} [/ilmath], where again [ilmath]a[/ilmath] is the representative of the class.^[1]

I quite like the hat notation, however I recommend one avoids using it when there are multiple Equivalence relations at play.

If there are multiple ones, then we can write for example [ilmath][a]_{\sim_1} [/ilmath] for a class in [ilmath]\sim_1[/ilmath] and [ilmath][f]_{\sim_2} [/ilmath] for [ilmath]\sim_2[/ilmath]

Equivalence relations partition sets

An equivalence relation is a partition

Equivalence classes are either the same or disjoint

This is the motivation for how cosets partition groups.

References

1. ↑ Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici

TODO: Add proofs and whatnot