Difference between revisions of "Homeomorphism"
m (→Topological Homeomorphism) |
m |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Using [[Continuity definitions are equivalent]] it is easily seen that the metric space definition ''implies'' the topological definition. That is to say: | Using [[Continuity definitions are equivalent]] it is easily seen that the metric space definition ''implies'' the topological definition. That is to say: | ||
* If {{M|f}} is a (metric) homeomorphism then is is also a topological one (when the topologies considered are those [[Topology induced by a metric|those induced by the metric]]. | * If {{M|f}} is a (metric) homeomorphism then is is also a topological one (when the topologies considered are those [[Topology induced by a metric|those induced by the metric]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Terminology and notation== | ||
+ | If there exists a ''homeomorphism'' between two spaces, {{M|X}} and {{M|Y}} we say<ref name="FOAT"/>: | ||
+ | * {{M|X}} and {{M|Y}} are ''homeomorphic'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The notations used (with ''most common first'') are: | ||
+ | # (Find ref for {{M|\cong}}) | ||
+ | # {{M|\approx}}<ref name="FOAT"/> - '''NOTE: ''' really rare, I've only ever seen this used to denote homeomorphism in this one book. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Composition of continuous maps is continuous]] | * [[Composition of continuous maps is continuous]] | ||
+ | * [[Diffeomorphism]] | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 00:28, 9 October 2015
Not to be confused with Homomorphism
Contents
[hide]Homeomorphism of metric spaces
Given two metric spaces (X,d) and (Y,d′) they are said to be homeomorphic[1] if:
- There exists a mapping f:(X,d)→(Y,d′) such that:
- f is bijective
- f is continuous
- f−1 is also a continuous map
Then (X,d) and (Y,d′) are homeomorphic and we may write (X,d)≅(Y,d′) or simply (as Mathematicians are lazy) X≅Y if the metrics are obvious
TODO: Find reference for use of ≅ notation
Topological Homeomorphism
A topological homeomorphism is bijective map between two topological spaces f:(X,J)→(Y,K) where:
- f is bijective
- f is continuous
- f−1 is continuous
Technicalities
This section contains pedantry. The reader should be aware of it, but not concerned by not considering it In order for f−1 to exist, f must be bijective. So the definition need only require[2]:
- f be continuous
- f−1 exists and is continuous.
Agreement with metric definition
Using Continuity definitions are equivalent it is easily seen that the metric space definition implies the topological definition. That is to say:
- If f is a (metric) homeomorphism then is is also a topological one (when the topologies considered are those those induced by the metric.
Terminology and notation
If there exists a homeomorphism between two spaces, X and Y we say[2]:
- X and Y are homeomorphic
The notations used (with most common first) are:
- (Find ref for ≅)
- ≈[2] - NOTE: really rare, I've only ever seen this used to denote homeomorphism in this one book.
See also
References
- Jump up ↑ Functional Analysis - George Bachman Lawrence Narici
- ↑ Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 2.2 Fundamentals of Algebraic Topology, Steven H. Weintraub