Difference between revisions of "Continuity and non-surjective functions"
(Created page with "==Basis== Consider a path in a topological space, {{M|(X,\mathcal{J})}}, then a path is simply: * {{M|p:([0,1]\subset\mathbb{R},...") |
m |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Todo|Attempt proof, I'm on the train right now!}} | {{Todo|Attempt proof, I'm on the train right now!}} | ||
* '''A map is continuous {{M|\iff}} it is continuous with the [[subspace topology]] on its image''' | * '''A map is continuous {{M|\iff}} it is continuous with the [[subspace topology]] on its image''' | ||
+ | ===Notes/Work in progress=== | ||
+ | {{Blue Notebox|This is a WIP section}} | ||
+ | Let {{M|f:(X,\mathcal{J})\rightarrow(Y,\mathcal{K})}} be a non-[[Surjection|surjective]] map | ||
+ | : I claim that this is continuous {{M|\iff}} {{M|f':(X,\mathcal{J})\rightarrow(I,\mathcal{S})}} is continuous where: | ||
+ | :* {{M|1=I:=\text{Im}(f)}} and | ||
+ | :* {{M|1=\mathcal{S} }} is the [[Subspace topology|subspace topology]] on {{M|I}} induced by {{M|\mathcal{K} }} | ||
+ | '''Proof: ''' {{M|f}} is continuous {{M|\implies}} {{M|f'}} is continuous | ||
+ | : Let {{M|V\in\mathcal{S} }} be given, we wish to show that {{M|f'^{-1}(V) }} is open in {{M|X}} | ||
+ | :: By hypothesis {{M|\exists U\in\mathcal{K} }} such that {{M|f^{-1}(U) }} is open, and additionally, {{M|1=V=U\cap I}} | ||
+ | :: We need to show that {{M|1=f'^{-1}(V)=f^{-1}(U)}} | ||
+ | ::: Proof that {{M|f'^{-1}(V)\subseteq f^{-1}(U)}} | ||
+ | :::: Let {{M|x\in f'^{-1}(V)}}, then {{M|\exists y\in V}} such that {{M|1=f'(x)=y}} | ||
+ | ::::: As [[the intersection of sets is a subset of each set]] and {{M|1=V=U\cap I}} we have: | ||
+ | :::::* {{M|V\subseteq U}} - which is useful immediately, and | ||
+ | :::::* {{M|V\subseteq I}} - which isn't useful yet.. | ||
+ | ::::: Using {{M|V\subseteq U}} by the [[implies-subset relation]] we see that | ||
+ | :::::* {{M|y\in V}} and {{M|y\in I}} | ||
+ | ::::: we have {{M|1=x\in f'^{-1}(V)\implies\exists y\in V[f'(x)=y\wedge y\in U\wedge y\in I]}} | ||
+ | ::::: as {{M|y\in I}} we know {{M|\forall A[y\in A\implies f^{-1}(A)\ne\emptyset]}} - for any set containing {{M|I}} the inverse isn't empty | ||
+ | :::::* As by definition, {{M|I}} is the image! | ||
+ | ::::: Thus {{M|1=\implies\exists x'[f^{-1}(y)=x']}} | ||
+ | ::::: As {{M|y\in U}} we know that {{M|x'\in f^{-1}(U)}} | ||
+ | {{Todo|Show equality?}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[Category:Topology]][[Category:Discussion]] | [[Category:Topology]][[Category:Discussion]] |
Latest revision as of 17:42, 6 September 2015
Basis
Consider a path in a topological space, [ilmath](X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath], then a path is simply:
- [ilmath]p:([0,1]\subset\mathbb{R},\vert\cdot\vert)\rightarrow(X,\mathcal{J})[/ilmath] where [ilmath]\vert\cdot\vert[/ilmath] denotes the absolute value
Then for this to be continuous we require that:
- [ilmath]\forall U\in\mathcal{J}[p^{-1}(U)\in\mathcal{O}([0,1],\vert\cdot\vert)][/ilmath] where [ilmath]\mathcal{O} [/ilmath] denotes the open sets of a space
Misconception
I was once puzzled by this definition
TODO: Add picture
For consider a path on a surface, and now take any open set that intersects with that path. A good chunk of that isn't used, what if it overlaps with 2 or more line segments?
- None of this is a problem, even if the open set doesn't intersect with the line at all, well [ilmath]p^{-1}(U)=\emptyset[/ilmath], but the empty set is open in any topology, so it isn't a problem.
- Topologies are also closed under unions (any union) - so even if there are multiple parts of the loop, it doesn't matter.
It didn't take me long to realise this but it's important to understand what it means when we throw continuity around like this.
Possible theorem
TODO: Attempt proof, I'm on the train right now!
- A map is continuous [ilmath]\iff[/ilmath] it is continuous with the subspace topology on its image
Notes/Work in progress
Let [ilmath]f:(X,\mathcal{J})\rightarrow(Y,\mathcal{K})[/ilmath] be a non-surjective map
- I claim that this is continuous [ilmath]\iff[/ilmath] [ilmath]f':(X,\mathcal{J})\rightarrow(I,\mathcal{S})[/ilmath] is continuous where:
- [ilmath]I:=\text{Im}(f)[/ilmath] and
- [ilmath]\mathcal{S}[/ilmath] is the subspace topology on [ilmath]I[/ilmath] induced by [ilmath]\mathcal{K} [/ilmath]
Proof: [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is continuous [ilmath]\implies[/ilmath] [ilmath]f'[/ilmath] is continuous
- Let [ilmath]V\in\mathcal{S} [/ilmath] be given, we wish to show that [ilmath]f'^{-1}(V) [/ilmath] is open in [ilmath]X[/ilmath]
- By hypothesis [ilmath]\exists U\in\mathcal{K} [/ilmath] such that [ilmath]f^{-1}(U) [/ilmath] is open, and additionally, [ilmath]V=U\cap I[/ilmath]
- We need to show that [ilmath]f'^{-1}(V)=f^{-1}(U)[/ilmath]
- Proof that [ilmath]f'^{-1}(V)\subseteq f^{-1}(U)[/ilmath]
- Let [ilmath]x\in f'^{-1}(V)[/ilmath], then [ilmath]\exists y\in V[/ilmath] such that [ilmath]f'(x)=y[/ilmath]
- As the intersection of sets is a subset of each set and [ilmath]V=U\cap I[/ilmath] we have:
- [ilmath]V\subseteq U[/ilmath] - which is useful immediately, and
- [ilmath]V\subseteq I[/ilmath] - which isn't useful yet..
- Using [ilmath]V\subseteq U[/ilmath] by the implies-subset relation we see that
- [ilmath]y\in V[/ilmath] and [ilmath]y\in I[/ilmath]
- we have [ilmath]x\in f'^{-1}(V)\implies\exists y\in V[f'(x)=y\wedge y\in U\wedge y\in I][/ilmath]
- as [ilmath]y\in I[/ilmath] we know [ilmath]\forall A[y\in A\implies f^{-1}(A)\ne\emptyset][/ilmath] - for any set containing [ilmath]I[/ilmath] the inverse isn't empty
- As by definition, [ilmath]I[/ilmath] is the image!
- Thus [ilmath]\implies\exists x'[f^{-1}(y)=x'][/ilmath]
- As [ilmath]y\in U[/ilmath] we know that [ilmath]x'\in f^{-1}(U)[/ilmath]
- As the intersection of sets is a subset of each set and [ilmath]V=U\cap I[/ilmath] we have:
- Let [ilmath]x\in f'^{-1}(V)[/ilmath], then [ilmath]\exists y\in V[/ilmath] such that [ilmath]f'(x)=y[/ilmath]
- Proof that [ilmath]f'^{-1}(V)\subseteq f^{-1}(U)[/ilmath]
TODO: Show equality?