Difference between revisions of "Notes:Lambda calculus"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Saving progress so far)
 
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
We define {{lambda|terms}} as follows:<ref name="LCAC">Lambda Calculus and Combinators, an introduction, J. Roger Hindley and Jonathan P. Seldin</ref><br/>
 
We define {{lambda|terms}} as follows:<ref name="LCAC">Lambda Calculus and Combinators, an introduction, J. Roger Hindley and Jonathan P. Seldin</ref><br/>
 
Let the following be given:
 
Let the following be given:
* ''Variables'': an infinite [[sequence]] of expressions, {{M|v_1,\cdots,v_n\cdots}} <ref group="Note">The book uses {{M|v_0,v_{00},v_{000},\cdots}} for some yet unknown reason</ref>
+
* ''Variables'': an infinite [[sequence]] of expressions, {{M|v_1,\ldots,v_n\ldots}} <ref group="Note">The book uses {{M|v_0,v_{00},v_{000},\cdots}} for some yet unknown reason</ref>
 
* ''Atomic constants'': a sequence of expressions again, that may also be finite or empty
 
* ''Atomic constants'': a sequence of expressions again, that may also be finite or empty
 
The set of expressions called ''{{lambda|terms}}'' is defined inductively as follows:
 
The set of expressions called ''{{lambda|terms}}'' is defined inductively as follows:
Line 16: Line 16:
 
===Examples===
 
===Examples===
 
* {{M|(\lambda v_0.(v_0v_{00}))}} - a function that {{M|x\mapsto x(v_{00})}} I think
 
* {{M|(\lambda v_0.(v_0v_{00}))}} - a function that {{M|x\mapsto x(v_{00})}} I think
 +
Here {{M|x}}, {{M|y}} and {{M|z}} are distinct variables:
 +
* {{M|(\lambda x.(xy))}} - a function that {{M|x\mapsto x(y)}} I think
 +
* {{M|((\lambda y.y)(\lambda x.(xy)))}} - This is difficult to put into words, but simply results in the function that {{M|x\mapsto x(y)}}
 +
* {{M|(x(\lambda x.(\lambda x.x)))}} - This is nasty, it looks like {{M|x(x)}}
 +
* {{M|(\lambda x.(yz))}} 'constant' function that {{M|x\mapsto y(z)}}
 +
===Notations===
 +
* Capital letters denote arbitrary {{lambda}} terms
 +
* {{M|x,y,z,u,v,w}} will denote variables
 +
* Brackets will be skipped where it is understood that things are left associative, that is:
 +
** {{M|MNPQ}} is understood to mean {{M|(((MN)P)Q)}} (which to us means: {{M|((M(N))(P))(Q)}} - you can see why this notation is dropped!)
 +
* {{M|(\lambda x.(PQ))}} will become {{M|\lambda x.PQ}}
 +
* {{M|(\lambda x_1.(\lambda x_2.(\ldots(\lambda x_n.M)\ldots))).}} becomes {{M|\lambda x_1x_2\ldots x_n.M}}
 +
* Syntatic identity will be denoted by {{M|\equiv}}, so {{M|M\equiv N}} will mean that {{M|M}} is exactly the same term as {{M|N}}
 +
===Length of a term===
 +
The length of a term {{M|M}} is denoted {{M|\text{lng}(M)}} and is the total number of occurrences of atoms in {{M|M}}
 +
===Occurs in===
 +
See page 6 of<ref name="LCAC"/>
 +
===Scope===
 +
(This is similar to scopes in programming languages)<br/>
 +
For a particular occurrence of {{M|\lambda x.M}} in a {{lambda|term}} {{M|P}}, the occurrence of {{M|M}} is called the ''scope'' of the occurrence of {{M|\lambda x}} immediately to the left.
  
 +
==Free and bound variables==
 +
An occurrence of a variable {{M|x}} in a term {{M|P}} is called:
 +
* ''Bound'' if it is in the scope of a {{M|\lambda x}} in {{M|P}}
 +
* ''Bound and binding'' if and only if it is the {{M|x}} in {{M|\lambda x}}
 +
* ''Free'' otherwise.
 +
In addition:
 +
* If {{M|x}} has at least one ''binding'' occurrence in {{M|P}} we call it a ''bound variable of {{M|P}}''
 +
** This requires thought but once it clicks it should be obvious, any variable that is a parameter of a function is a bound variable (at some point, even if unused)
 +
* If {{M|x}} has at least one ''free'' occurrence in {{M|P}} we call it a ''free variable of {{M|P}}''
 +
* We denote the set of free variables of {{M|P}} as: {{M|\text{FV}(P)}}
 +
 +
==Substitution==
 +
For any {{M|M}}, {{M|N}} and {{M|x}} define:
 +
* {{M|[N/x]M}} as the result of ''substituting'' {{M|N}} for every ''free'' occurrence of {{M|x}} in M, and changing the bound variables to avoid name clashes.
 +
The exact definition is given inductively as follows
 +
# {{M|[N/x]x \equiv N}}
 +
(more to come, there's 7 in total)
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references group="Note"/>
 
<references group="Note"/>

Revision as of 20:41, 11 August 2015

This is a NOTES page, so it isn't an actual page in the wiki yet!

Lambda terms

We define [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-terms as follows:[1]
Let the following be given:

  • Variables: an infinite sequence of expressions, [ilmath]v_1,\ldots,v_n\ldots[/ilmath] [Note 1]
  • Atomic constants: a sequence of expressions again, that may also be finite or empty

The set of expressions called [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-terms is defined inductively as follows:

  1. All variables and atomic constants are [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-terms
    • These are known as atoms
  2. If [ilmath]M[/ilmath] and [ilmath]N[/ilmath] are [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-terms then [ilmath](MN)[/ilmath] is a [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-term
    • Known as applications
    • this is a short hand for [ilmath]M(N)[/ilmath] in our modern terminology[1]
  3. If [ilmath]M[/ilmath] is any [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-term and [ilmath]x[/ilmath] any variable then [ilmath](\lambda x.M)[/ilmath] is a [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-term
    • Any such expression is called an abstraction

Examples

  • [ilmath](\lambda v_0.(v_0v_{00}))[/ilmath] - a function that [ilmath]x\mapsto x(v_{00})[/ilmath] I think

Here [ilmath]x[/ilmath], [ilmath]y[/ilmath] and [ilmath]z[/ilmath] are distinct variables:

  • [ilmath](\lambda x.(xy))[/ilmath] - a function that [ilmath]x\mapsto x(y)[/ilmath] I think
  • [ilmath]((\lambda y.y)(\lambda x.(xy)))[/ilmath] - This is difficult to put into words, but simply results in the function that [ilmath]x\mapsto x(y)[/ilmath]
  • [ilmath](x(\lambda x.(\lambda x.x)))[/ilmath] - This is nasty, it looks like [ilmath]x(x)[/ilmath]
  • [ilmath](\lambda x.(yz))[/ilmath] 'constant' function that [ilmath]x\mapsto y(z)[/ilmath]

Notations

  • Capital letters denote arbitrary [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]- terms
  • [ilmath]x,y,z,u,v,w[/ilmath] will denote variables
  • Brackets will be skipped where it is understood that things are left associative, that is:
    • [ilmath]MNPQ[/ilmath] is understood to mean [ilmath](((MN)P)Q)[/ilmath] (which to us means: [ilmath]((M(N))(P))(Q)[/ilmath] - you can see why this notation is dropped!)
  • [ilmath](\lambda x.(PQ))[/ilmath] will become [ilmath]\lambda x.PQ[/ilmath]
  • [ilmath](\lambda x_1.(\lambda x_2.(\ldots(\lambda x_n.M)\ldots))).[/ilmath] becomes [ilmath]\lambda x_1x_2\ldots x_n.M[/ilmath]
  • Syntatic identity will be denoted by [ilmath]\equiv[/ilmath], so [ilmath]M\equiv N[/ilmath] will mean that [ilmath]M[/ilmath] is exactly the same term as [ilmath]N[/ilmath]

Length of a term

The length of a term [ilmath]M[/ilmath] is denoted [ilmath]\text{lng}(M)[/ilmath] and is the total number of occurrences of atoms in [ilmath]M[/ilmath]

Occurs in

See page 6 of[1]

Scope

(This is similar to scopes in programming languages)
For a particular occurrence of [ilmath]\lambda x.M[/ilmath] in a [ilmath]\lambda[/ilmath]-term [ilmath]P[/ilmath], the occurrence of [ilmath]M[/ilmath] is called the scope of the occurrence of [ilmath]\lambda x[/ilmath] immediately to the left.

Free and bound variables

An occurrence of a variable [ilmath]x[/ilmath] in a term [ilmath]P[/ilmath] is called:

  • Bound if it is in the scope of a [ilmath]\lambda x[/ilmath] in [ilmath]P[/ilmath]
  • Bound and binding if and only if it is the [ilmath]x[/ilmath] in [ilmath]\lambda x[/ilmath]
  • Free otherwise.

In addition:

  • If [ilmath]x[/ilmath] has at least one binding occurrence in [ilmath]P[/ilmath] we call it a bound variable of [ilmath]P[/ilmath]
    • This requires thought but once it clicks it should be obvious, any variable that is a parameter of a function is a bound variable (at some point, even if unused)
  • If [ilmath]x[/ilmath] has at least one free occurrence in [ilmath]P[/ilmath] we call it a free variable of [ilmath]P[/ilmath]
  • We denote the set of free variables of [ilmath]P[/ilmath] as: [ilmath]\text{FV}(P)[/ilmath]

Substitution

For any [ilmath]M[/ilmath], [ilmath]N[/ilmath] and [ilmath]x[/ilmath] define:

  • [ilmath][N/x]M[/ilmath] as the result of substituting [ilmath]N[/ilmath] for every free occurrence of [ilmath]x[/ilmath] in M, and changing the bound variables to avoid name clashes.

The exact definition is given inductively as follows

  1. [ilmath][N/x]x \equiv N[/ilmath]

(more to come, there's 7 in total)

Notes

  1. The book uses [ilmath]v_0,v_{00},v_{000},\cdots[/ilmath] for some yet unknown reason

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lambda Calculus and Combinators, an introduction, J. Roger Hindley and Jonathan P. Seldin