Difference between revisions of "Compactness"
m |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| − | A [[Topological space|topological space]] is compact if every [[ | + | A [[Topological space|topological space]] is compact if every [[Covering|open cover]] (often denoted <math>\mathcal{A}</math>) of <math>X</math> contains a finite sub-collection that also covers <math>X</math> |
==Lemma for a set being compact== | ==Lemma for a set being compact== | ||
Revision as of 05:23, 15 February 2015
There are two views here.
- Compactness is a topological property and we cannot say a set is compact, we say it is compact and implicitly consider it with the subspace topology
- We can say "sure that set is compact".
The difference comes into play when we cover a set (take the interval [ilmath][0,5]\subset\mathbb{R} [/ilmath]) with open sets. Suppose we have the covering [ilmath]\{(-1,3),(2,6)\} [/ilmath] this is already finite and covers the interval. The corresponding sets in the subspace topology are [ilmath]\{[0,3),(2,5]\} [/ilmath] which are both open in the subspace topology.
Contents
Definition
A topological space is compact if every open cover (often denoted [math]\mathcal{A}[/math]) of [math]X[/math] contains a finite sub-collection that also covers [math]X[/math]
Lemma for a set being compact
Take a set [math]Y\subset X[/math] in a topological space [math](X,\mathcal{J})[/math].
To say [math]Y[/math] is compact is for [math]Y[/math] to be compact when considered as a subspace of [math](X,\mathcal{J})[/math]
That is to say that [math]Y[/math] is compact if and only if every covering of [math]Y[/math] by sets open in [math]X[/math] contains a finite subcovering covering [math]Y[/math]
Proof
[math]\implies[/math]
Suppose that the space [math](Y,\mathcal{J}_\text{subspace})[/math] is compact and that [math]\mathcal{A}=\{A_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}[/math] where each [math]A_\alpha\in\mathcal{J}[/math] (that is each set is open in [math]X[/math]).
Then the collection [math]\{A_\alpha\cap Y|\alpha\in I\}[/math] is a covering of [math]Y[/math] by sets open in [math]Y[/math] (by definition of being a subspace)
By hypothesis [math]Y[/math] is compact, hence a finite sub-collection [math]\{A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y\}^n_{i=1}[/math] covers [math]Y[/math] (as to be compact every open cover must have a finite subcover)
Then [math]\{A_{\alpha_i}\}^n_{i=1}[/math] is a sub-collection of [math]\mathcal{A}[/math] that covers [math]Y[/math].
Details
As The intersection of sets is a subset of each set and [math]\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)=Y[/math] we see
[math]x\in\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\implies\exists k\in\mathbb{N}\text{ with }1\le k\le n:x\in A_{\alpha_k}\cap Y[/math] [math]\implies x\in A_{\alpha_k}\implies x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}[/math]
The important part being [math]x\in\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\implies x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}[/math]
then by the implies and subset relation we have [math]Y=\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}[/math] and conclude [math]Y\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}[/math]
Lastly, as [math]\mathcal{A}[/math] was a covering [math]\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha=Y[/math].
It is clear that [math]x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\implies x\in\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha[/math] so again implies and subset relation we have:
[math]\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha=Y[/math] thus concluding [math]\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset Y[/math]
Combining [math]Y\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}[/math] and [math]\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset Y[/math] we see [math]\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}=Y[/math]
Thus [math]\{A_{\alpha_i}\}^n_{i=1}[/math] is a finite covering of [math]Y[/math] consisting of open sets from [math]X[/math]
[math]\impliedby[/math]
Suppose that every covering of [math]Y[/math] by sets open in [math]X[/math] contains a finite subcollection covering [math]Y[/math]. We need to show [math]Y[/math] is compact.
Suppose we have a covering, [math]\mathcal{A}'=\{A'_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}[/math] of [math]Y[/math] by sets open in [math]Y[/math]
For each [math]\alpha[/math] choose an open set [math]A_\alpha[/math] open in [math]X[/math] such that: [math]A'_\alpha=A_\alpha\cap Y[/math]
Then the collection [math]\mathcal{A}=\{A_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}[/math] covers [math]Y[/math]
By hypothesis we have a finite sub-collection of things open in [math]X[/math] that cover [math]Y[/math]
Thus the corresponding finite subcollection of [math]\mathcal{A}'[/math] covers [math]Y[/math]
